首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Comments on 'A systematic review of the reliability of objective structured clinical examination scores'
【24h】

Comments on 'A systematic review of the reliability of objective structured clinical examination scores'

机译:关于“对客观结构化临床检查分数可靠性的系统评价”的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Editor - We read with interest the recent article by Brannick et al. entitled 'A systematic review of the reliability of objective structured clinical examination scores'. The article emphasises important points about assumptions of quality relating to objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) and the need for OSCEs to have adequate construct validity as part of a wider assessment framework. In keeping with work previously described, the authors1 highlight considerable variation in whole examination reliability (as measured by Cron-bach's alpha), concluding that particular design features of the OSCE may be influential in this respect.
机译:编辑-我们感兴趣地阅读了Brannick等人的最新文章。题为“客观结构化临床检查分数可靠性的系统评价”。本文强调有关客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)的质量假设的重要要点,以及OSCE作为更广泛的评估框架的一部分必须具有足够的结构效度的要求。与先前描述的工作保持一致,作者1强调了整个考试可靠性的巨大差异(以Cron-bach的alpha值衡量),并得出结论认为OSCE的特定设计特征可能会在这方面产生影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号