首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Paired basic science and clinical problem-based learning faculty teaching side by side: do students evaluate them differently?
【24h】

Paired basic science and clinical problem-based learning faculty teaching side by side: do students evaluate them differently?

机译:将基础科学与基于临床问题的学习型教师配对使用:学生对他们的评价不同吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Many studies have evaluated the desirability of expert versus non-expert facilitators in problem-based learning (PBL), but performance differences between basic science and clinical facilitators has been less studied. In a PBL course at our university, pairs of faculty facilitators (1 clinician, 1 basic scientist) were assigned to student groups to maximise integration of basic science with clinical science. AIMS: This study set out to establish whether students evaluate basic science and clinical faculty members differently when they teach side by side. METHODS: Online questionnaires were used to survey 188 students about their faculty facilitators immediately after they completed each of 3 serial PBL cases. Overall satisfaction was measured using a scale of 1-7 and yeso responses were gathered from closed questions describing faculty performance. results: Year 1 students rated basic science and clinical facilitators the same, but Year 2 students rated the clinicians higher overall. Year 1 students rated basic scientists higher in their ability to understand the limits of their own knowledge. Year 2 students rated the clinicians higher in several content expertise-linked areas: preparedness, promotion of in-depth understanding, and ability to focus the group, and down-rated the basic scientists for demonstrating overspecialised knowledge. Students' overall ratings of individual faculty best correlated with the qualities of stimulation, focus and preparedness, but not with overspecialisation, excessive interjection of the faculty member's own opinions, and encouragement of psychosocial issue discussion. CONCLUSION: When taught by paired basic science and clinical PBL facilitators, students in Year 1 rated basic science and clinical PBL faculty equally, while Year 2 students rated clinicians more highly overall. The Year 2 difference may be explained by perceived differences in content expertise.
机译:简介:许多研究已经评估了基于问题的学习(PBL)中专家与非专家服务商的可取性,但是对基础科学与临床服务商之间的绩效差异的研究较少。在我们大学的PBL课程中,将成对的教员(1名临床医生,1名基础科学家)分配给学生团体,以最大程度地将基础科学与临床科学融合。目的:该研究旨在确定学生并肩教学时是否对基础科学和临床教职员工进行不同的评估。方法:在线调查问卷用于调查188名学生的教师辅导员后,立即完成3个系列PBL案例中的每一个。总体满意度以1-7的等级进行衡量,从描述教师绩效的封闭问题中收集了是/否答案。结果:一年级学生对基础科学和临床辅导员的评分相同,但二年级学生对临床医生的总体评价较高。一年级学生对基础科学家的理解能力更高。 2年级的学生在与专业知识相关的几个方面对临床医生给予更高的评价:准备,促进深入了解以及使小组专注的能力,并贬低了基础科学家以展示过分专业的知识。学生对单个教师的总体评价与激励,专注和准备的素质最相关,但与过度专业化,对教师自身观点的过多插入以及对社会心理问题的鼓励无关。结论:由基础科学和临床PBL辅导员共同授课时,一年级的学生对基础科学和临床PBL教职员工的评价相同,而二年级的学生对临床医生的总体评价更高。 2年级差异可以用内容专业知识的差异来解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号