The influence of admissions variables on first year medical school performance: a study from Newcastle University, Australia.

摘要

AIMS: This study examined the relationship between the performance of first year medical students at the University of Newcastle, Australia, and admission variables: previous educational experience, and entry classification (standard -- academic or composite, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, or overseas), age and gender. METHODS: Admission and demographic information was obtained for students who entered first year medicine at Newcastle between the years 1994 and 1997 inclusive. Academic performance was measured according to results of first assessment ('satisfactory' vs. 'not satisfactory') and the final assessment of the first year ('satisfactory' vs. 'not satisfactory'). Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between predictor variables and outcomes. RESULTS: Assessment and admissions information was obtained for 278 students, 98% of all students who entered the medical course between 1994 and 1997. Regression analysis of first assessment indicated that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and overseas students were significantly more likely to be 'not satisfactory' than all other students (RR=3.1,95% CI: 1.4. - 6 7 and RR=1.5, 95% CI: 1.2-1.8, respectively). Analysis of final assessment indicated these two student groups were also significantly more likely to be 'not satisfactory' than all other students (RR=4.5, 95% CI: 1.4-13.5 and RR=3.5, 95% CI: 1.2-10.8, respectively). At first assessment, students entering via the standard academic pathway and older students were less likely to be 'not satisfactory' (RR=0.6, 95% CI: 0.5-0.7 and RR=0.8, 95% CI: 0.7-0.9, respectively). However both these differences were not evident at final assessment. There were no significant relationships between performance in first year and the remaining variables. CONCLUSIONS: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, and overseas medical students had academic difficulties in the first year of the course, suggesting the need for extra course support. The result may reflect the educational and other obstacles these students must overcome in order to enter and progress through their medical degree. More research is warranted to explore the extent to which these differences persist throughout the medical degree.