【24h】

Validation of a decision regret scale.

机译:验证决策后悔量表。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: As patients become more involved in health care decisions, there may be greater opportunity for decision regret. The authors could not find a validated, reliable tool for measuring regret after health care decisions. METHODS: A 5-item scale was administered to 4 patient groups making different health care decisions. Convergent validity was determined by examining the scale's correlation with satisfaction measures, decisional conflict, and health outcome measures. RESULTS: The scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.81 to 0.92). It correlated strongly with decision satisfaction (r = -0.40 to -0.60), decisional conflict (r = 0.31 to 0.52), and overall rated quality of life (r = -0.25 to -0.27). Groups differing on feelings about a decision also differed on rated regret: F(2, 190) = 31.1, P < 0.001. Regret was greater among those who changed their decisions than those who did not, t(175) = 16.11, P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: The scale is a useful indicator of health care decision regret at a given point in time.
机译:背景:随着患者越来越多地参与医疗保健决策,可能会有更多机会做出决策后悔。作者无法找到一种经过验证的可靠工具来衡量在做出医疗保健决定后的遗憾。方法:对4个患者组进行5个项目的量表,以制定不同的医疗保健决定。收敛效度是通过检查量表与满意度测评,决策冲突和健康结果测评的相关性来确定的。结果:量表显示出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha = 0.81至0.92)。它与决策满意度(r = -0.40至-0.60),决策冲突(r = 0.31至0.52)和总体额定生活质量(r = -0.25至-0.27)密切相关。在决定感上不同的组在后悔评分上也不同:F(2,190)= 31.1,P <0.001。改变决定的人比没有改变的人感到遗憾,t(175)= 16.11,P <0.001。结论:量表是在给定时间点做出卫生保健决定后悔的有用指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号