首页> 外文期刊>Medical law review >A CRITICAL COMMENTARY ON DEREK MORGAN'S UNPUBLISHED MANUSCRIPT: 'COMING BACK TO LIFE: THE NORMAL CHAOS OF MEDICAL LAW' AND HOW TO DEAL WITH PROPERTY IN HUMAN CELLS
【24h】

A CRITICAL COMMENTARY ON DEREK MORGAN'S UNPUBLISHED MANUSCRIPT: 'COMING BACK TO LIFE: THE NORMAL CHAOS OF MEDICAL LAW' AND HOW TO DEAL WITH PROPERTY IN HUMAN CELLS

机译:关于德里克·莫根(Derek Morgan)未经发表的稿件的重要评论:“重返生命:医法的正常混乱”以及如何处理人类细胞的财产

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article is an analysis of Derek Morgan's manuscript-'Coming Back to Life: The Normal Chaos of Medical Law', which remained unpublished at his death in 2011. Morgan made two claims in the manuscript: (1) medical practitioners and patients approach health from the different perspectives of 'reason' and 'emotion' respectively, while medical law treads the line between these ultimately resulting in 'normal chaos'. (2) In this respect, medical law ought to be coaxed 'back to life' so that it can address broader principles and values in respect to practical resolution; however, it has, in the face of this chaos, become dull in its ambitions. In this article, I first analyse these two claims in detail, before, second, illustrating the 'normal chaos' of medical law using the debate over ownership of human cells and tissues. I draw my own conclusions as to whether Morgan's final thesis was successful.
机译:本文是对德里克·摩根(Derek Morgan)的手稿“重返生活:医法的正常混乱”的分析,该手稿于2011年去世时未出版。摩根在手稿中提出了两点主张:(1)医生和患者要健康分别从“理性”和“情感”的不同角度出发,而医学法则在两者之间划清界限,最终导致“正常混乱”。 (2)在这方面,应将医务法“重生”,以使其能够解决关于实际解决方案的更广泛的原则和价值;然而,面对这种混乱,它的野心变得迟钝了。在本文中,我首先详细分析这两个主张,然后再使用关于人类细胞和组织所有权的辩论来说明医学法的“正常混乱”。关于Morgan的最终论文是否成功,我得出自己的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号