首页> 外文期刊>Medical dosimetry: official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists >Dosimetric verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy of 172 patients treated for various disease sites: comparison of EBT film dosimetry, ion chamber measurements, and independent MU calculations.
【24h】

Dosimetric verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy of 172 patients treated for various disease sites: comparison of EBT film dosimetry, ion chamber measurements, and independent MU calculations.

机译:强度调制放射治疗的172例患者接受了各种疾病部位的剂量学验证:EBT膜剂量学,离子室测量值和独立MU计算的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Three independent dose verification methods for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were evaluated. Planar IMRT dose distributions were delivered to EBT film and scanned with the Epson Expression 1680 flatbed scanner. The measured dose distributions were then compared to those calculated with a Pinnacle treatment planning system. The IMRT treatments consisted of 7 to 9 6-MV beams for different treatment sites. The films were analyzed using FilmQA (3cognition LLC, Great Neck, NY) software. Comparisons between measured and calculated dose distributions are reported as dose difference (DD) (pixels within +/- 5%), distance to agreement (DTA) (3 mm), as well as gamma values (gamma) (dose = +/- 3%, distance = 2 mm). Point dose measurements with an ion chamber at isocenter were compared to dose calculated at that point. An independent monitor units (MUs) calculation program was also used for verification. For the film dose distributions, DD values varied from 92% to 97%, with head-and-neck and lung treatments showing lower values. Gamma varied from 93% to 98%, and DTA was well above 99%. The isocenter dose measurements deviated from 0.008 to 0.028 from the calculated dose. The larger deviations were attributed to high-dose gradients at the isocenter. RadCalc MU calculations gave differences from 0.027 to 0.079. The larger differences observed were for beams crossing large areas of heterogeneous tissue and were attributed to the limitations of the simple path-length correction method employed in RadCalc. In conclusion, the 3 independent verification methods for each IMRT patient at our institution demonstrated very good agreement between measurements and calculations and gave us the confidence that our IMRT treatments are delivered accurately.
机译:评价了三种独立的剂量验证方法用于调强放射治疗(IMRT)。平面IMRT剂量分布传送到EBT胶片上,并用Epson Expression 1680平板扫描仪进行扫描。然后将测得的剂量分布与Pinnacle治疗计划系统计算出的剂量分布进行比较。 IMRT治疗包括7到9个6-MV光束,用于不同的治疗部位。使用FilmQA(3cognition LLC,Great Neck,NY)软件对胶片进行分析。测量和计算的剂量分布之间的比较报告为剂量差(DD)(像素在+/- 5%范围内),一致距离(DTA)(3 mm)以及伽马值(γ)(剂量= +/- 3%,距离= 2毫米)。将等离子中心离子室的点剂量测量值与该点计算的剂量进行比较。独立监视单元(MUs)的计算程序也用于验证。对于薄膜剂量分布,DD值从92%到97%不等,头颈和肺部治疗的DD值较低。伽玛值从93%到98%不等,而DTA远高于99%。等中心剂量测量值从计算的剂量偏离0.008至0.028。较大的偏差归因于等中心点处的高剂量梯度。 RadCalc MU计算得出的差异为0.027至0.079。观察到的较大差异是针对穿过大面积异质组织的光束,这归因于RadCalc中使用的简单路径长度校正方法的局限性。总之,我们机构中每位IMRT患者的3种独立验证方法在测量和计算之间显示出很好的一致性,并给我们带来了我们的IMRT治疗准确交付的信心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号