首页> 外文期刊>Medical care >Assessing the impact of propensity score estimation and implementation on covariate balance and confounding control within and across important subgroups in comparative effectiveness research.
【24h】

Assessing the impact of propensity score estimation and implementation on covariate balance and confounding control within and across important subgroups in comparative effectiveness research.

机译:在比较有效性研究中,评估倾向评分估计和实施对协变量平衡的影响,并混淆重要子组内部和之间的控制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Both overall PSs and CVD subgroup-specific PSs achieved good balance on measured covariates when assessing the relative association of diabetes monotherapy with nonfatal myocardial infarction. PS matching generally led to better balance than stratification, but with smaller sample size. Our study is limited insofar as crude differences were minimal, suggesting that the new user, active comparator design identified patients with some equipoise between treatments.
机译:当评估糖尿病单药治疗与非致命性心肌梗塞的相对联系时,总体PS和CVD亚组特异性PS均在测量的协变量上达到了良好的平衡。 PS匹配通常比分层导致更好的平衡,但样本量较小。我们的研究在粗略差异很小的范围内是有限的,这表明新的用户,积极的比较者设计确定了治疗之间具有一定平衡的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号