首页> 外文期刊>Medical care research and review: MCRR >Weighing public and private options for reforming long-term care financing: findings from a national survey of specialists.
【24h】

Weighing public and private options for reforming long-term care financing: findings from a national survey of specialists.

机译:权衡改革长期护理筹资的公共和私人选择:国家专家调查的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Deficiencies in current long-term care (LTC) financing models are substantial and must be addressed if the nation is going to meet the needs of the growing population of frail and disabled elders. Because debate over reforming LTC financing has traditionally focused on the relative roles of the public and private sectors, this article examines what characteristics predispose LTC specialists to weigh one approach--public or private--more than the other. Data are derived from a Web-based survey of 1,147 individuals with known or demonstrable experience with LTC, including consumer advocates, provider representatives, policy experts, and public officials. Results suggest that support for spurring private sector mechanisms, bolstering the government's role, and reforming Medicare and Medicaid vary with key characteristics of the respondents, including experiential, attitudinal, and background variables. Findings also suggest consensus that reform of LTC financing should improve on the current public-private partnership in this area.
机译:当前的长期护理(LTC)融资模式存在重大缺陷,如果该国要满足日益增长的脆弱和残障老年人的需求,就必须解决该缺陷。由于有关LTC融资改革的争论传统上一直侧重于公共部门和私营部门的相对角色,因此本文探讨了哪些特征使LTC专家倾向于权衡一种方法(公共或私有)而不是另一种方法。数据来自对1147位具有LTC已知或可证明经验的个人进行的基于Web的调查,其中包括消费者权益倡导者,提供者代表,政策专家和政府官员。结果表明,对支持私营部门机制,加强政府作用以及改革医疗保险和医疗补助的支持随受访者的关键特征而变化,包括经验,态度和背景变量。研究结果还表明,共识是,LTC融资改革应在该领域当前的公私合作关系上得到改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号