首页> 外文期刊>Medical decision making: An international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making >Assessing the Influence of Gestalt-TypeCharacteristics on Preferences OverLifetime Health Profiles
【24h】

Assessing the Influence of Gestalt-TypeCharacteristics on Preferences OverLifetime Health Profiles

机译:评估格式塔特性对首选项终生健康状况的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction. In contrast to the basic tenets of economic theory, there is substantial evidence that people's remembered and predicted utility of events systematically differs from the utility that they experience. These systematic differences are caused by "gestalt characteristics." The objective of this study was to test whether people maximize quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), or whether QALY maximization is compromised by their being influenced by factors that resemble the gestalt characteristics when choosing between lifetime health profiles. Methods. Time trade-off values were elicited from 50 respondents, who were also presented with a series of hypothetical questions that each depicted 2 lifetime health profiles. The respondents were asked to choose which of the 2 profiles in each question they would prefer to experience. By inputting the values that the respondents placed on the health states into the lifetime health profiles, it was possible to observe whether their answers were consistent with QALY maximization or with various hypothesized gestalt-type effects. Results. Across decisions that involve a simple trade-off between the length of life and the quality of thehealth state, choices consistent with QALY maximizing were relatively common, although even here approximately half of the respondents violated this rule. Consistency with QALY maximization was lower in most of the other tests and indicated that many people might, for example, prefer to trade off some lifetime health to experience a good end to life, or to avoid highly unstable lifetime health profiles. Conclusion. The respondents' answers were often consistent with the hypothesized gestalt-type effects, but it is probable that for some of the questions the characteristics themselves were not driving the respondents' answers and that factors such as complex rates of discounting might have played a role. However, whatever the driving motivation behind the respondents' answers, the important point to note from this study is that QALY maximization is often substantially and systematically violated when people are offered a choice over the lifetime health profiles that they would prefer to experience.
机译:介绍。与经济学理论的基本原理相反,有大量证据表明人们对事件的记忆和预测效用在系统上不同于他们所经历的效用。这些系统差异是由“格式塔特性”引起的。这项研究的目的是检验人们是否在选择一生健康状况时,是否将质量调整生命年(QALYs)最大化,或者是否受类似于格式塔特征的因素的影响而影响了QALY最大化。方法。时间权衡值来自50位受访者,他们还面临一系列假设问题,每个问题都描绘了2个终生健康状况。要求受访者在每个问题中选择两个个人资料中的哪个他们更希望体验。通过将受访者对健康状况的重视程度输入到一生的健康状况中,可以观察他们的答案是否与QALY最大化或各种假设的格式塔型效应一致。结果。在涉及寿命和健康状态质量之间简单权衡的决策中,与QALY最大化相一致的选择相对普遍,尽管即使在这里大约一半的受访者也违反了该规则。在大多数其他测试中,与QALY最大化的一致性较低,并且表明,例如,许多人可能更愿意权衡一些终生健康,以享有生命的美好结局,或避免高度不稳定的终生健康状况。结论。受访者的答案通常与假设的格式塔型效应相符,但是对于某些问题,特征本身并不能驱动受访者的答案,并且诸如折现率的复杂性等因素可能起到了作用。但是,无论受访者回答背后的动力是什么,本研究中要注意的重要一点是,当为人们提供他们愿意体验的终生健康状况的选择时,QALY最大化经常被系统性地违反。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号