...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Medical Association Journal: Journal de l'Association Medicale Canadienne >A comparison of blood pressure measurement over a sleeved arm versus a bare arm.
【24h】

A comparison of blood pressure measurement over a sleeved arm versus a bare arm.

机译:套筒手臂与裸露手臂的血压测量结果比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The measurement of blood pressure is a common clinical exam with important health consequences. We sought to determine whether the measurement of blood pressure over a sleeved arm varies from that taken on a bare arm. METHODS: We recruited 376 patients between 18 and 85 years of age from a family medicine clinic between September 2004 and November 2006. They all had their blood pressure recorded using the same automatic oscillometric device, with the cuff placed over their bare arms for the first reading. Each patient was then randomly assigned to either the bare-arm group, for which the second blood pressure reading was also taken on a bare arm, or the sleeved-arm group, for which the second reading was taken with the cuff placed over the patient's sleeve. RESULTS: The mean age of the 376 participants was 61.6 years (standard deviation 15.0), 61% of the participants were male, 41% had hypertension and 11.7% had diabetes. We found no clinically important differences between the bare-arm group (n = 180) and the sleeved-arm group (n = 196) in age, sex or body mass index. The mean differences between the first and second readings for patients in the bare-arm group were 4.1 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8 to 5.5) for systolic blood pressure and 0.1 mm Hg (95% CI -0.7 to 0.9) for diastolic blood pressure. The mean differences between the first and second readings for patients in the sleeved-arm group were 3.4 mm Hg (95% CI 2.1 to 4.7) for systolic blood pressure and 0.4 mm Hg (95% CI -0.4 to 1.3) for diastolic blood pressure. The between-group differences in these values was 0.76 mm Hg (95% CI -1.13 to 2.65) for systolic and -0.31 mm Hg (95% CI -1.48 to 0.86) for diastolic blood pressure; neither of these differences was clinically important or statistically significant. INTERPRETATION: We found that there was no significant difference in blood pressure recorded over a sleeve or on a bare arm. For practical purposes, the decision to measure blood pressure on a bare arm or over a sleeved arm should be left to the judgment of the health care professional taking the blood pressure.
机译:背景:血压测量是一种常见的临床检查,对健康有重要影响。我们试图确定套筒手臂上的血压测量值与裸露手臂上的血压测量值是否不同。方法:我们在2004年9月至2006年11月期间从一家家庭医学诊所招募了376位18至85岁的患者。他们都使用同一台自动示波仪记录了血压,第一次将袖套放在裸手上读。然后将每位患者随机分配到裸手组(也要在裸手上进行第二次血压读数)或袖套组(对他们进行第二次读数时,将袖带放在患者的手臂上)袖。结果:376名参与者的平均年龄为61.6岁(标准差15.0),其中61%的参与者为男性,41%的患有高血压和11.7%的患有糖尿病。我们没有发现裸臂组(n = 180)和袖套组(n = 196)在年龄,性别或体重指数方面在临床上没有重要的差异。裸露臂组患者的第一次和第二次读数之间的平均差异是收缩压为4.1 mm Hg(95%置信区间[CI] 2.8至5.5)和0.1 mm Hg(95%CI -0.7至0.9)。用于舒张压。袖带组患者第一次和第二次读数之间的平均差异是收缩压为3.4 mm Hg(95%CI 2.1至4.7)和舒张压为0.4 mm Hg(95%CI -0.4至1.3) 。这些值的组间差异对于收缩压为0.76 mm Hg(95%CI -1.13至2.65),对于舒张压为-0.31 mm Hg(95%CI -1.48至0.86);这些差异均无临床意义或统计学意义。解释:我们发现在袖子或裸露的手臂上记录的血压没有显着差异。出于实际目的,测量裸露的手臂或袖子上的血压的决定应留给医疗保健专业人员进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号