...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical hypotheses >Scrotal pouch as a urinary reservoir: a surgical revolution or bizarre hypothesis?
【24h】

Scrotal pouch as a urinary reservoir: a surgical revolution or bizarre hypothesis?

机译:阴囊袋作为尿液储存库:外科手术革命还是奇怪的假设?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

I read this article Verit et al. with great interest. However there are some facts limiting this hypothesis. First, this procedure is not applicable for women due to the use of scrotal pouch. Second, bilateral orchiectomy or luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists represent the standard of care for metastatic prostate cancer not for the localized cancers . In the article also cited by Verit et al., significant prostate cancer is detected in 25 of 121 cystoprostatectomy specimens without any lymph node metastasis . This means there was no indication for bilateral orchiectomy in that present bladder cancer population. The other recommended option, fixation of testis to the psoas muscle will increase the risk of testicular cancer and may lead to testicular atrophy as a cause of increased temperature .
机译:我读了Verit等人的这篇文章。很有兴趣。但是,有一些事实限制了这一假设。首先,由于使用阴囊袋,该程序不适用于女性。第二,双侧睾丸切除术或促黄体生成激素释放激素激动剂代表转移性前列腺癌的治疗标准,而不是局部癌的治疗标准。在Verit等人还引用的文章中,在121例膀胱前列腺切除术标本中有25例检测到明显的前列腺癌,没有任何淋巴结转移。这意味着在目前的膀胱癌人群中没有双侧睾丸切除术的迹象。另一个推荐的选择是,将睾丸固定在腰大肌上会增加睾丸癌的风险,并可能导致睾丸萎缩,这是体温升高的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号