首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Geotechnical Journal >Effects of the construction sequence of twin tunnels at different depths on an existing pile
【24h】

Effects of the construction sequence of twin tunnels at different depths on an existing pile

机译:不同深度的双隧道施工顺序对既有桩的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Any tunnelling process inevitably induces changes in stress in the ground and may adversely affect nearby pile foundations. The interaction between tunnelling and an existing pile has been investigated by researchers and a certain amount of fundamental understanding has been gained. However, the effects of different tunnel excavation sequences on an adjacent pile remain to be understood. In this paper, a series of three-dimensional centrifuge model tests and numerical back-analyses were carried out to investigate the effects of construction sequence of twin tunnels on an existing pile in dry sand. Two tunnelling sequences were investigated: (i) a sequence involving tunnelling near the pile toe followed by tunnelling near the mid-depth of the pile shaft (i.e., test TS); (ii) sequence involving tunnelling near the mid-depth of the pile shaft followed by tunnelling near the pile toe (i.e., test ST). The measured cumulative pile settlement was about 33% larger for tunnelling sequence ST than for tunnelling sequence TS. Due to different tunnelling sequences, the apparent losses of pile capacity were 40% and 29% for sequences ST and TS, respectively. Although the computed reductions in normal stress acting on the pile induced by twin tunnelling were almost the same in tests TS and ST, tunnelling near the pile toe induced a larger decrease in the end-bearing and shaft resistances at the lower part of the pile in test ST than in test TS. In contrast to the measured pile head settlements, different tunnelling sequences had a limited effect on measured ground surface settlements and additional bending moments in the pile.
机译:任何掘进过程都不可避免地会引起地面应力变化,并可能对附近的桩基产生不利影响。研究人员已经研究了隧道与现有桩之间的相互作用,并获得了一定程度的基本理解。然而,不同隧道开挖顺序对相邻桩的影响仍有待了解。本文进行了一系列的三维离心模型试验和数值反分析,以研究双隧道施工顺序对干砂中已有桩的影响。研究了两个掘进顺序:(i)涉及在桩趾附近掘进然后在桩身中深度附近掘进的序列(即测试TS); (ii)顺序包括在桩身中深度附近挖洞,然后在桩头附近挖洞(即测试ST)。测得的累积桩沉降对于隧道序列ST而言要比对于隧道序列TS大约33%。由于不同的掘进顺序,顺序ST和TS的桩容量表观损失分别为40%和29%。尽管在试验TS和ST中计算得出的双隧道引起的作用在桩上的法向应力的减小几乎相同,但在桩脚趾附近的隧道引起了桩下部下部的端承和竖井阻力的较大减小。测试ST比测试TS中的要好。与测得的桩头沉降相比,不同的掘进顺序对测得的地面沉降和桩中的附加弯矩影响有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号