首页> 外文期刊>Management science: Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences >Private Network EDI vs. Internet Electronic Markets: A Direct Comparison of Fulfillment Performance
【24h】

Private Network EDI vs. Internet Electronic Markets: A Direct Comparison of Fulfillment Performance

机译:专用网EDI与互联网电子市场:履行绩效的直接比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Prior literature has documented the performance benefits from the use of electronic data interchange (EDI) and the Internet. Using purchase and fulfillment records from the U. S. government's Federal Supply Service, we provide a direct comparison of performance between a private network EDI channel and an Internet electronic market. Performance is measured using order cycle time and complete orders fulfilled. Our findings show that the Internet-based electronic market outperforms the EDI-based channel on these two important measures. Order cycle times were significantly lower when using the Internet-based electronic market, whereas the percentage of complete shipments was significantly higher after controlling for product, transaction, seller, and buyer-specific factors. The electronic market even outperforms the EDI channel when buyer and transaction characteristics favor the use of EDI. Because EDI is still prevalent in many industries, these results point to the gains that may be realized by switching to the newer technology.
机译:先前的文献记录了使用电子数据交换(EDI)和Internet所带来的性能优势。使用来自美国政府联邦供应服务的购买和履行记录,我们可以直接比较专用网络EDI渠道和互联网电子市场的性能。使用订单周期时间和完成的订单来衡量绩效。我们的研究结果表明,在这两项重要措施上,基于Internet的电子市场优于基于EDI的渠道。使用基于Internet的电子市场时,订单周期时间明显缩短,而在控制了产品,交易,卖方和买方特定因素之后,完整发货的百分比显着增加。当买方和交易特征都支持EDI的使用时,电子市场甚至会超过EDI渠道。由于EDI在许多行业中仍很普遍,因此这些结果表明,通过改用新技术可以实现的收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号