...
首页> 外文期刊>Manual therapy. >Pain neurophysiology education for the management of individuals with chronic low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.
【24h】

Pain neurophysiology education for the management of individuals with chronic low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机译:慢性神经痛患者的疼痛神经生理学教育:系统评价和荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pain neurophysiology education (PNE) is a form of education for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the evidence for PNE in the management of pateints with CLBP. A literature search of MEDLINE, CINAHL and AMED was performed from 1996(01)-2010(09). RCT appraisal and synthesis was assessed using the Cochrane Back Review Group (CBRG) guidelines. The main outcome measures were pain, physical-function, psychological-function, and social-function. Two moderate quality RCTs (n=122) were included in the final review. According to the CBRG criteria there was very low quality evidence that PNE is beneficial for pain, physical-function, psychological-function, and social-function. Meta-analysis found PNE produced statistically significant but clinically small improvements in short-term pain of 5mm (0, 10.0mm) [mean difference (95%CI)] on the 100mm VAS. This review was limited by the small number of studies (n=2) that met the inclusion criteria and by the fact that both studies were produced by the same group that published the PNE manual. These factors contributed to the relatively low grading of the evidence. There is a need for more studies investigating PNE by different research groups to support early promising findings. Until then firm clinical recommendations cannot be made.
机译:疼痛神经生理学教育(PNE)是针对慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者的一种教育形式。这项系统评价的目的是调查PNE在CLBP治疗患者中的证据。从1996(01)-2010(09)开始对MEDLINE,CINAHL和AMED进行文献检索。使用Cochrane Back Review Group(CBRG)指南评估了RCT评估和综合。主要结局指标为疼痛,身体功能,心理功能和社交功能。最终评价中包括两个中等质量的RCT(n = 122)。根据CBRG标准,仅有极低的质量证据表明PNE对疼痛,身体功能,心理功能和社交功能有益。荟萃分析发现,在100mm VAS上,PNE对5mm(0,10.0mm)[平均差异(95%CI)]的短期疼痛产生统计学上的显着改善,但临床上略有改善。这项审查受到满足纳入标准的少量研究(n = 2)的限制,并且两个研究都是由出版PNE手册的同一小组进行的。这些因素导致证据等级较低。需要更多的研究来调查不同研究小组的PNE,以支持早期有希望的发现。在此之前,无法提出确切的临床建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号