首页> 外文期刊>Management Communication Quarterly >Cultural Discourses and Discursive Resources for Meaning/ful Work: Constructing and Disrupting Identities in Contemporary Capitalism
【24h】

Cultural Discourses and Discursive Resources for Meaning/ful Work: Constructing and Disrupting Identities in Contemporary Capitalism

机译:有意义/有意义的工作的文化话语和话语资源:当代资本主义的建构和破坏身份

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In their landmark The New Spirit of Capitalism, Boltanski and Chiapello (2005) show how, over time, capitalism has generated differing ideologies, or "spirits," to justify the system's existence. To defend capitalism against criticisms of its harms for individuals, its present version frames work as a key source of personal meaningfulness and identity creation. Tracing the contours of this capitalist spirit, Boltanski and Chiapello show that finding meaning in work increasingly requires that people blur distinctions between private and professional lives, become free agents who identify with their career over any given organization, and display continual flexibility, self-control, and creativity. Discourses that apply most clearly to economic concerns are embedded in determinations of meaning and significance well beyond corporate settings, as concerns for accountability, sus-tainability, and efficiency are now common across social domains. Although there is no shortage of proclamations of such dramatic changes, Boltanski and Chiapello usefully highlight the need to understand the social and institutional forces that shape people's orientation to work and, in so doing, draw attention to how personal identities and work commitments are formed well beyond participation in specific organizations. Following this reasoning, our aim in this article is not to define meaning or to delineate the organizational practices that make work meaningful (e.g., Brief & Nord, 1990; Driver, 2007; Loher, Noe, Moeller, & Fitzgerald, 1985). Rather, we examine how the capitalist spirit's conception of meaningfulness is discursively constructed (as well as disrupted) and how these constructions shape personal identities.
机译:Boltanski和Chiapello(2005)在其具有里程碑意义的《资本主义新精神》中,展示了随着时间的流逝,资本主义如何产生不同的意识形态或“精神”来证明系统的存在。为了捍卫资本主义免受批评其对个人的伤害,它的当前版本框架是个人意义和身份创造的重要来源。 Boltanski和Chiapello追寻这种资本主义精神的轮廓,表明在工作中寻找意义越来越需要人们模糊私人生活和专业生活之间的区别,成为在任何给定组织中认同自己职业的自由代理,并表现出持续的灵活性,自我控制和创造力。对于经济问题最清楚地使用的论述已嵌入到意义和重要性的确定中,远远超出了公司环境,因为对责任,可持续性和效率的关注现在在整个社会领域中都很普遍。尽管不乏这种戏剧性变化的声明,但Boltanski和Chiapello强调指出了必须了解影响人们工作取向的社会和制度力量,并在此过程中提请人们注意个人身份和工作承诺的良好形成方式除了参与特定组织。按照这种推理,我们在本文中的目的不是定义含义或描述使工作有意义的组织实践(例如,Brief&Nord,1990; Driver,2007; Loher,Noe,Moeller,&Fitzgerald,1985)。相反,我们研究了资本主义精神的意义概念是如何被话语建构(以及被破坏)的,以及这些建构如何塑造个人身份。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号