首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of earth sciences >A new genus of ichthyosaur from the Late Triassic Pardonet Formation of British Columbia: bridging the Triassic-Jurassic gap
【24h】

A new genus of ichthyosaur from the Late Triassic Pardonet Formation of British Columbia: bridging the Triassic-Jurassic gap

机译:来自不列颠哥伦比亚省晚三叠世帕多涅特组的鱼龙科的一个新属:弥合三叠纪-侏罗纪的鸿沟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Both the genus Shastasaurus and the family Shastasauridae have long been hard to define due to the fragmentary nature of the type specimens. Consequently, recent interpretations of the genus have been based almost entirely on Shastasaurus neoscapularis from the Late Triassic Pardonet Formation of British Columbia. Two new specimens of this taxon, from Pink Mountain, British Columbia, demonstrate that it does not belong in the genus Shastasaurus. This paper describes the new specimens, and refers the species to Metashastasaurus gen nov. Post-cranially, the skeleton of Metashastasaurus resembles that of shastasaurids, differing primarily only in the shape of the scapula and fibula. However, the skull has a unique combination of characters, including large diamond-shaped frontals that enter the supratemporal fenestrae, and very narrow posterior extensions of the nasals, which contact the postfrontals. It also differs from the skull of Shastasaurus in the presence of both a parietal ridge and postparietal shelf. This is a combination of derived characters previously known only in Jurassic forms. The front limb has four proximal carpals and four digits, indicating that previous reconstructions were based on incomplete material. Shastasaurus pacificus Merriam 1895, the type species of the genus Shastasaurus, must be considered a nomen dubium, making the genus Shastasaurus invalid. Until this problem is clarified, the use of the generic name Shastasaurus should be restricted to Merriam's type specimens, of which only Shastasaurus alexandrae and Shastasaurus osmonti are based on adequate material.
机译:由于类型标本的片段性,长期以来Shashasauridae属和Shastasauridae家族都很难定义。因此,该属的最新解释几乎完全基于不列颠哥伦比亚省晚三叠世帕尔多涅特组的新肩Sha。来自不列颠哥伦比亚省平克山的该分类单元的两个新标本表明,它不属于Shastasaurus属。本文介绍了新的标本,并将该物种引到了新月球藻。在颅骨后,后of龙的骨架类似于sha龙的骨架,主要区别是肩the骨和腓骨的形状不同。但是,头骨具有独特的字符组合,包括进入上颌前窗的大型菱形额叶,以及与后额叶接触的非常狭窄的鼻后延伸。它也与Shastasaurus的头骨不同,它同时具有顶脊和顶顶架子。这是以前仅以侏罗纪形式已知的派生字符的组合。前肢有四个近端腕骨和四个手指,表明先前的重建是基于不完整的材料。 Shastasaurus pacificus Merriam 1895,Shastasaurus属的典型种,必须被视为nomen dubium,使Shastasaurus属无效。在澄清此问题之前,应将通用名称“ Shastasaurus”的使用限制在Merriam的类型标本中,其中只有“ Shastasaurus alexandrae”和“ Shastasaurus osmonti”是基于适当的材料制成的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号