首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal: (Le devis de recherche, l'originalite et la coherence generale des manuscrits soumis au Journal influencent leur acceptation
【24h】

Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal: (Le devis de recherche, l'originalite et la coherence generale des manuscrits soumis au Journal influencent leur acceptation

机译:研究设计,原创性和整体一致性会影响提交至《华尔街日报》的手稿的接受或拒绝:

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To identify the characteristics of the manuscripts submitted to the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (CJA) associated with their acceptance or rejection and to analyze the reviewers' comments and their impact on the editors' decision to publish. METHODS: Peer review material was analyzed from 213 submissions to the CJA. Characteristics of accepted and rejected manuscripts were compared. Reviewers' comments were classified according to editorial criteria used by the journal and the distribution of the different types of comments amongst accepted and rejected submissions was compared. RESULTS: Characteristics of 213 manuscripts and comments from 405 reviewers were analyzed. Overall, 57% of manuscripts submitted to the CJA were accepted. The type of research (study vs case report, clinical vs laboratory science) had no impact on the fate of the manuscripts; however, frequency of acceptance differed between articles originating from different geographic regions (P < 0.0001) with Canadian submissionsposting the highest frequency (86%). Comment analysis suggests that the relationship between the experimental design, the results, and the conclusion was the main determinant of an article's fate. Lack of originality or inappropriate experimental design were likely to be associated with rejection. Conversely, aspects involving the presentation of manuscripts (tables, figures, references) were rarely cited as reasons to justify acceptance or rejection. CONCLUSION: Although articles are judged on many criteria, authors need to be aware that some aspects of a manuscript, namely the relationship between experimental design, results, and conclusions, the originality, and the use of an appropriate study design, are the most important features with regard to its acceptance or rejection.
机译:目的:确定提交给《加拿大麻醉学杂志》(CJA)的手稿的特征,包括接受或拒绝的特征,并分析审稿人的评论及其对编辑决定发表的影响。方法:对来自CJA的213篇论文的同行评审材料进行了分析。比较了接受和拒绝手稿的特征。根据期刊使用的编辑标准对评论者的评论进行分类,并对接受和拒绝的评论中不同类型评论的分布进行比较。结果:分析了405名审稿人的213篇论文的特征和评论。总体而言,提交给CJA的手稿中有57%被接受。研究类型(研究与病例报告,临床与实验室科学)对手稿的命运没有影响。但是,来自不同地理区域的文章之间的接受频率不同(P <0.0001),其中加拿大提交的文章出现频率最高(86%)。评论分析表明,实验设计,结果和结论之间的关系是决定文章命运的主要因素。缺乏独创性或不适当的实验设计可能与拒绝有关。相反,很少涉及涉及手稿(表格,图形,参考文献)的方面作为证明接受或拒绝的理由。结论:尽管文章是根据许多标准来评判的,但作者需要意识到,手稿的某些方面(即实验设计,结果和结论之间的关系,原创性以及使用适当的研究设计)是最重要的。有关其接受或拒绝的功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号