首页> 外文期刊>Fisheries Research >A comparison of obtaining field data using electronic and written methods
【24h】

A comparison of obtaining field data using electronic and written methods

机译:使用电子和书面方法获取现场数据的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The use of electronic measurement and recording devices was investigated during the Alaska Department of Fish and Game 2002 red king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus) stock assessment survey in Southeast Alaska. Because of the importance of survey data to fishery management, these data were also collected by written methods, allowing direct comparison of the two methods. Including, data collection and transferring to computer formal, electronic sampling was about three times faster than written methods. Additionally, when electronic methods were used, the sampling time, in person seconds, was about half that needed for written methods, potentially increasing the sample size for the survey. The few discernable differences between data collected by the two methods were primarily attributable to intersampler variability. Even with a prototype data collection system that was cumbersome to use, large savings in time and money could be realized with little effect on data collected. The limitations of the system used could easily be overcome with different equipment and careful attention to programming, further increasing data collection efficiency and accuracy.
机译:在阿拉斯加东南部的阿拉斯加鱼类和野生动物部2002年红帝王蟹(Paralithodes camtschaticus)种群评估调查中,对电子测量和记录设备的使用进行了调查。由于调查数据对渔业管理的重要性,这些数据也是通过书面方法收集的,可以直接比较这两种方法。包括数据收集和转移到计算机形式的电子采样在内,其速度大约是书面方法的三倍。此外,当使用电子方法时,以个人秒为单位的采样时间约为书面方法所需时间的一半,可能会增加调查的样本量。两种方法收集的数据之间的可辨别差异主要归因于采样器间的可变性。即使使用麻烦的原型数据收集系统,也可以节省大量时间和金钱,而对收集的数据影响很小。所使用的系统的局限性可以通过使用不同的设备轻松地克服,并且对编程的认真关注可以进一步提高数据收集的效率和准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号