首页> 外文期刊>Foster Natural Gas Report >Oregon LNG Provides FERC with Comprehensive Rebuttal to the Sierra Club, Clatsop County Residents, Plus Oregon’s Department of Energy and Department of Land Conservation and Development
【24h】

Oregon LNG Provides FERC with Comprehensive Rebuttal to the Sierra Club, Clatsop County Residents, Plus Oregon’s Department of Energy and Department of Land Conservation and Development

机译:俄勒冈州液化天然气为FERC提供了对Sierra俱乐部,Clatsop县居民以及俄勒冈州能源部和土地保护与开发部的全面反驳

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The LNG Development Co., LLC and Oregon Pipeline Co., LLC (together Oregon LNG) (CP09-6) blasted motions filed at FERC by Clatsop County, Oregon and the Sierra Club. Separately, Oregon LNG also moved under Rule 212 of the Commission’s rules to address comments filed by the Oregon Department of Energy (ODOE) and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). In sum, the Oregon LNG project developer claimed Sierra Club’s arguments that the project’s economic harms outweigh its benefits are all disconnected from actual facts pertaining to the project, and based on the same broad-based speculation and extrapolation that render the effects of induced production of natural gas “non-cognizable indirect effects” for purposes of the Commission’s NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) analysis.
机译:LNG开发有限公司和俄勒冈管道公司(统称俄勒冈州LNG)(CP09-6)对俄勒冈州克拉索普县和塞拉俱乐部(Sierra Club)在FERC提出的议案进行了爆炸。另外,俄勒冈州液化天然气还根据委员会规则第212条动议,以解决俄勒冈州能源部(ODOE)和俄勒冈州土地保护与发展部(DLCD)提出的意见。总而言之,俄勒冈州的液化天然气项目开发商声称Sierra Club的论点是,该项目的经济危害大于其收益都与该项目的实际事实脱节,并基于同样的广泛推测和推断,这些推断和推断都产生了诱因的生产。天然气用于委员会的NEPA(国家环境政策法案)分析的“不可识别的间接影响”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号