首页> 外文期刊>Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt >Forest science or forest sciences: interdisciplinarity between inevitability, vision, and utopia
【24h】

Forest science or forest sciences: interdisciplinarity between inevitability, vision, and utopia

机译:森林科学或森林科学:必然性,愿景和乌托邦之间的交叉学科

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Due to of its supposedly unusual research subjects and structure, forestry is often portrayed as a quintessential example of an interdisciplinary scientific field. There are three general arguments for the necessity of interdisciplinarity in all scientific practice: the "double orientation" of disciplines towards their objects and their questions, the social relativity of science, and the practical structure of scientific practice. In thus disputing the idea of a discipline and the complementary idea of disciplinarity, this article shows that there are many reasons why disciplines exist, but disciplinarity in scientific practice does not. In their daily work, however, scientists typically see disciplinarity as a real impediment to interdisciplinary cooperation. Therefore, although interdisciplinary practice is inevitable, it requires active management. This article characterizes the basic approaches to interdisciplinary cooperation in terms of their structure, form, and base. It identifies the central element of interdisciplinary cooperation as a management pool which organizes a permanent interdisciplinary discussion.
机译:由于其非同寻常的研究主题和结构,林业通常被描绘为跨学科科学领域的典型例子。在所有科学实践中都必须有跨学科性的三个普遍论点:学科针对其对象和问题的“双重取向”,科学的社会相对性以及科学实践的实践结构。在对一门学科的概念和学科的互补性概念进行争论时,本文表明存在学科的原因很多,而科学实践中却没有学科的原因。但是,在日常工作中,科学家通常将纪律性视为跨学科合作的真正障碍。因此,尽管跨学科实践是不可避免的,但仍需要积极管理。本文从结构,形式和基础的角度描述了跨学科合作的基本方法。它确定了跨学科合作的核心要素作为组织永久性跨学科讨论的管理池。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号