首页> 外文期刊>Foundations of science >Scientific discovery: between incommensurability of paradigms and historical continuity
【24h】

Scientific discovery: between incommensurability of paradigms and historical continuity

机译:科学发现:范式的不可通约性与历史连续性之间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Discoveries in physics imply two elements. The first one is the belief that formal tools, already founded in the framework of existing mathematical theories, may offer the solution to a puzzling anomaly. The second one is the ability to assign a physical meaning to the adopted formalism, and to consider all its theoretical implications. Discussing an historical case where the adoption of a particular formalism represents the real motor of the creative intuition, we mean to delineate scientific discovery both as a discontinuous change with respect to previous achievements and as a linear process of knowledge enrichment. On March 1948, during the Pocono conference that followed the one held in Shelter Island, Feynman analysed the electron-photon interaction formulating it in terms of the Lagrangian formalism, The development of Feynman's idea draws attention to the point that novel theoretical discoveries may be the result of applying existing formal tools, They may be the result of giving different interpretations to previous scientific thinking (according to the hermeneutical point that not even scientific texts have a single, absolute meaning but are given a multiplicity of possible readings by different people in different contexts).
机译:物理学中的发现包含两个要素。第一个信念是,已经在现有数学理论框架内建立的形式化工具可以为令人困惑的异常提供解决方案。第二个能力是赋予采用的形式主义以物理意义,并考虑其所有理论含义的能力。讨论采用特定形式主义代表创新直觉的真正动力的历史案例,我们的意思是描述科学发现,既是对先前成就的不连续变化,又是知识丰富的线性过程。 1948年3月,在举行在Shelter岛举行的Pocono会议期间,Feynman用拉格朗日形式主义分析了构成它的电子-光子相互作用。Feynman观点的发展提请人们注意新的理论发现可能是使用现有正式工具的结果,它们可能是对先前的科学思维做出不同解释的结果(根据解释学观点,甚至科学文本甚至都没有单一的绝对含义,但是不同人在不同领域给予了多种可能的解读方式上下文)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号