首页> 外文期刊>Forest Ecology and Management >Direct seeding of late-successional trees to restore tropical montane forest. (Special Issue: The ecology and ecosystem services of native trees: implications for reforestation and land restoration in Mesoamerica.)
【24h】

Direct seeding of late-successional trees to restore tropical montane forest. (Special Issue: The ecology and ecosystem services of native trees: implications for reforestation and land restoration in Mesoamerica.)

机译:后期播种的树木直接播种,以恢复热带山地森林。 (特刊:本地树木的生态和生态系统服务:对中美洲造林和土地恢复的影响。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Natural regeneration of large-seeded, late-successional trees in fragmented tropical landscapes can be strongly limited by a lack of seed dispersal resulting in the need for more intensive restoration approaches, such as enrichment planting, to include these species in future forests. Direct seeding may be an alternative low-cost approach to planting nursery-raised tree seedlings, but there is minimal information on its efficacy or when in the successional process this technique will be most successful. We tested directly seeding five native tree species into habitats representing passive and active restoration approaches: (1) recently abandoned pasture; (2) naturally establishing, young secondary forests; and (3) young, mixed-species (fast-growing N-fixers and commercially valuable species) tree plantations established to facilitate montane forest recovery in southern Costa Rica. We monitored germination, survival, growth, and above- and below-ground biomass over a 2-year period. Germination in pastures, secondary forests, and tree plantations was similar (~43%). Seedling survival after one and two years was significantly higher under tree plantations (91% year 1, 75% year 2) compared to secondary forests (76, 44%) or pastures (74, 41%). Moreover, seedlings had greater total biomass and lower root:shoot ratios in the plantations, suggesting higher nutrient availability in that treatment. Costs for direct seeding were 10- to 30-fold less per 100 seedlings after 2-year compared to nursery-raised seedlings planted at the same sites; however, there are important trade-offs to the two restoration approaches. Planting nursery-raised seedling is a more effective but higher cost approach for rapidly establishing canopy cover and restoring large areas whereas direct seeding is a more efficient way to enrich an existing system. We particularly recommend using direct seeding as a complimentary measure to the more intensive restoration approach of planting fast-growing and N-fixing trees.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.038
机译:在零散的热带景观中,大种子的,后期成功的树木的自然再生可能会由于缺乏种子散播而受到严重限制,从而导致需要更密集的恢复方法,例如富集种植,以便将这些物种包括在未来的森林中。直接播种可能是种植苗圃树苗的另一种低成本方法,但是关于其功效或在后续过程中何时最成功的信息很少。我们直接测试了将五种本地树种播种到代表被动和主动恢复方法的栖息地中:(1)最近废弃的牧场; (2)自然地建立年轻的次生林; (3)为促进哥斯达黎加南部山地森林的恢复而建立的混合树种(快速生长的固氮剂和商业上有价值的树种)人工林。我们监测了两年内的发芽,存活,生长以及地上和地下生物量。牧场,次生林和人工林中的发芽率相似(〜43%)。与人工林(76%,44%)或牧场(74%,41%)相比,人工林(一年1年,占91%,第二年75%),一年和两年后的幼苗存活率显着提高。此外,幼苗在人工林中具有更高的总生物量和较低的根:茎比,表明该处理中的养分利用率更高。与在相同地点种植的苗木相比,两年后每100棵苗直接播种的成本要低10到30倍。但是,这两种恢复方法都需要权衡取舍。种植苗圃育苗是快速建立树冠覆盖和恢复大面积的更有效但成本更高的方法,而直接播种是丰富现有系统的更有效方法。我们特别建议使用直接播种作为对种植快速生长和固氮树的更密集恢复方法的补充措施。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.038

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号