首页> 外文期刊>Forest Policy and Economics >Can legality verification rescue global forest governance? Analyzing the potential of public and private policy intersection to ameliorate forest challenges in Southeast Asia
【24h】

Can legality verification rescue global forest governance? Analyzing the potential of public and private policy intersection to ameliorate forest challenges in Southeast Asia

机译:合法性验证可以拯救全球森林治理吗?分析公共和私人政策交叉点缓解东南亚森林挑战的潜力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One of the most important and pressing questions of our times is to understand better what types of governance arrangements at the local, domestic and international levels, as well as innovative non-state market driven mechanisms that might best address fundamentally important but seemingly intractable environmental, economic and social challenges. This paper sheds light on these questions by assessing the emergence of legality verification as a means to address global forest degradation. Legality verification is puzzling because it presents a relatively modest solution compared to previous efforts to build a legally binding global forest convention, global certification systems or domestic focused "good forest governance" initiatives, and yet it is garnering the interest of wide ranging and diverse global coalitions within developed and developing countries. Does the relatively limited scope of legality verification represent a "race to the bottom" in global forest regulation that many scholars assert is inevitable with the rise of economic globalization? Or, does legality verification trigger the beginning of a process that may provide institutional solutions to global forest governance in ways that previous efforts have yet to accomplish? The purpose of this paper is to offer a theoretical framework with which to guide future research on these questions. To accomplish this task we distinguish conceptually legality verification from global certification and domestic good forest governance initiatives. We then review current support in developed and developing countries, focusing our lens on coalitions supporting legality verification in the United States, European Union, and Southeast Asia. Third, inductively from this review, and deductively, we develop propositions to guide further conceptual and empirical researches focusing on the institutionalization "logics" of legality verification to become an authoritative arena of global forest governance, as well as its potential to reinforce, rather than detract from, global certification and good forest governance initiatives. (c) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:我们这个时代最重要和紧迫的问题之一是,更好地了解地方,国内和国际各级的哪种治理安排,以及创新的非国家​​市场驱动机制,这些机制可能最能解决根本上重要但看似棘手的环境,经济和社会挑战。本文通过评估合法性验证作为解决全球森林退化的一种手段的出现来阐明这些问题。合法性验证令人困惑,因为与以前为建立具有法律约束力的全球森林公约,全球认证系统或以国内为重点的“良好森林治理”倡议而做出的努力相比,它提供了一个相对适度的解决方案,但它却引起了广泛而多样化的全球性关注。发达国家和发展中国家内的联盟。合法性验证的相对有限的范围是否代表着许多学者断言随着经济全球化的崛起不可避免的全球森林监管中的“低谷竞赛”?或者,合法性验证是否触发了流程的开始,该流程可能以以前的努力尚未完成的方式为全球森林治理提供机构解决方案?本文的目的是提供一个理论框架,以指导今后对这些问题的研究。为了完成此任务,我们将概念上的合法性验证与全球认证和国内良好森林治理计划区分开来。然后,我们回顾了发达国家和发展中国家当前的支持,重点是支持美国,欧盟和东南亚的合法性验证联盟。第三,从本综述的归纳法和演绎法的角度出发,我们提出命题,以指导进一步的概念和实证研究,侧重于合法性验证的制度化“逻辑”,以成为全球森林治理的权威舞台,并增强其潜力,而非有损于全球认证和良好的森林治理计划。 (c)2011年由Elsevier B.V.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号