首页> 外文期刊>Forest Policy and Economics >Econometric studies of non-industrial private forest management a review and synthesis.
【24h】

Econometric studies of non-industrial private forest management a review and synthesis.

机译:非工业私有林经营的计量经济学研究综述与综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Forest policies and management increasingly rely on economic models to explain behaviors of landowners and to project forest outputs, inventories and land use. However, it is unclear whether the existing econometric models offer general conclusions concerning non-industrial private forest (NIPF) management or whether the existing results are case-specific. In this paper, we systematically review the empirical economics literature on NIPF timber harvesting, reforestation, and timber stand improvements (TSI). We confirm four primary categories of management determinants: market drivers, policy variables, owner characteristics and plot/resource conditions. We rely on the most basic form of meta-analysis, vote counting, to combine information from many studies to produce more general knowledge concerning the key determinants of harvesting, reforestation and TSI within these four categories. Despite substantial differences in the variables used across models, the use of meta-analysis enables the systematic identification of the factors that are most important in explaining NIPF management. We conclude with some methodological and policy suggestions..
机译:森林政策和管理越来越依赖经济模型来解释土地所有者的行为,并预测森林的产出,清单和土地利用。但是,尚不清楚现有的计量经济学模型是否能够提供有关非工业私有林(NIPF)管理的一般结论,或者现有结果是否针对特定情况。在本文中,我们系统地回顾了关于NIPF木材采伐,重新造林和林分改良(TSI)的经验经济学文献。我们确定了管理决定因素的四个主要类别:市场驱动因素,政策变量,所有者特征和地块/资源条件。我们依靠荟萃分析的最基本形式,即票数统计,来结合来自许多研究的信息,以产生关于这四个类别中伐木,再造林和TSI关键决定因素的更多常识。尽管跨模型使用的变量存在很大差异,但荟萃分析的使用可以系统地识别对于解释NIPF管理最重要的因素。我们以一些方法和政策建议作为结尾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号