...
首页> 外文期刊>Forest Policy and Economics >The value of cultural theory for participatory processes in natural resource management.
【24h】

The value of cultural theory for participatory processes in natural resource management.

机译:文化理论对于自然资源管理中参与过程的价值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Participation is viewed as an important means for promoting the sustainable management of natural resources. However, participation is not always successful. Conflicting values and power inequalities are all factors that can severely undermine participatory processes. Where so far the main focus of research has been on power imbalances and conflicting interests, this article focuses on another source of conflict, i.e. differing views of reality and underlying cultural biases. Research states that cultural theory (CT), which subdivides the divergent notions of reality into four worldviews (hierarchism, individualism, egalitarianism, fatalism), could be a useful tool to gain insight in conflicting views of reality and the consequences of these conflicting views for participatory processes. To investigate the value of CT for participation, a study in Java (Indonesia) was carried out to determine to what extent worldviews can be used to predict preferred strategies in forestry problems. The results show that an empirical identification of worldviews was possible. These worldviews however do not automatically explain how individuals address forestry problems. This might be because of the difficulty of measuring worldviews in relation to individuals' strategies. It might also be that CT's explanatory capacity is overestimated. In either case, we can conclude that CT the way it is used now is not the instrument that will help us solving the problems in participatory processes.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.12.001
机译:参与被视为促进自然资源可持续管理的重要手段。但是,参与并不总是成功的。价值观冲突和权力不平等都是严重破坏参与进程的因素。到目前为止,研究的主要重点是权力不平衡和利益冲突,本文着重探讨了冲突的另一种来源,即对现实的不同看法和潜在的文化偏见。研究表明,文化理论(CT)将现实的不同概念细分为四种世界观(等级主义,个人主义,平均主义,宿命论),可以成为了解现实中相互矛盾的观点以及这些相互冲突的观点的后果的有用工具。参与过程。为了研究CT对参与的价值,在Java(印度尼西亚)中进行了一项研究,以确定在何种程度上世界观可以用来预测林业问题中的首选策略。结果表明,对世界观进行实证鉴定是可能的。但是,这些世界观并不能自动解释个人如何解决林业问题。这可能是因为难以衡量与个人策略相关的世界观。 CT的解释能力也可能被高估了。无论哪种情况,我们都可以得出结论,即现在使用CT的方式并不能帮助我们解决参与式过程中的问题。Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.12 .001

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号