首页> 外文期刊>Forensic science international >The evidential value of intra-alveolar haemosiderin-macrophages in cases of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)
【24h】

The evidential value of intra-alveolar haemosiderin-macrophages in cases of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)

机译:肺泡内血铁蛋白巨噬细胞在婴儿猝死综合症(SIDS)病例中的证据价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Intra-alveolar deposits of haemosiderin have repeatedly been brought into connection with some diagnostic value, such as markers for previous imposed suffocation, smothering due to Munchausen syndrome by proxy or sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). This study is based on 104 SIDS cases and 14 controls (causes of death, e.g. inflammatory changes, internal haemorrhages, asphyxia, blunt force trauma or acute toxicity). The SIDS group comprised 44 females (aged 7 days to 12 months) and 60 males (aged 12 days to 16 months 8 days) with the ages of the controls ranging from 2 months 3 days to 47 months. Routine histology samples from the lungs were stained with Prussian blue and haemosiderin foci were counted in 20 hpf for each lung lobe by a pathologist blinded to the cause of death. Results were assigned to one of five categories for haemosiderin positivity. Data were analysed by the Levene-test revealing identical variances in both groups and with a two-sample t-test showing the mean values for haemosiderin counts not being significantly different between SIDS and control groups. Although the sizes of both samples differed considerably it is our opinion that the haemosiderin counts did not show sufficient diagnostic value. This outcome supports the latest results of other comparable investigations. Furthermore, it highlights the necessity to assess carefully positive haemosiderin findings to avoid false suspicion.
机译:血液中铁血苷的肺泡内沉积物已多次与某些诊断价值联系在一起,例如先前施加的窒息标记物,因代理人的Munchausen综合征而窒息或婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)。这项研究基于104位SIDS病例和14位对照(死亡原因,例如炎症变化,内部出血,窒息,钝器外伤或急性毒性)。 SIDS组包括44位女性(7天至12个月)和60位男性(12天至16个月8天),对照组的年龄从2个月至3天至47个月不等。用普鲁士蓝对来自肺的常规组织学样本进行染色,并由对死亡原因不知情的病理学家对每个肺叶以20hpf计数血红素铁蛋白的病灶。将结果分配给血红素阳性的五种类别之一。通过Levene检验对数据进行分析,结果显示两组均具有相同的方差,并通过两次样本t检验显示了SIDS与对照组之间血红素含量的平均值无显着差异。尽管两个样品的大小差异很大,但我们认为血铁蛋白的计数未显示出足够的诊断价值。这一结果支持了其他可比研究的最新结果。此外,它强调了必须仔细评估阳性血红素的发现,以避免错误的怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号