...
首页> 外文期刊>Gerodontology >A comparison of patient satisfaction between treatment with conventional complete dentures and overdentures in the elderly: a literature review.
【24h】

A comparison of patient satisfaction between treatment with conventional complete dentures and overdentures in the elderly: a literature review.

机译:常规义齿与老年人义齿治疗之间患者满意度的比较:文献综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: It has been stated that mandibular overdentures are more satisfactory than conventional dentures, but problems relating to the use of retrospective ratings, lack of control group and sequential provision of treatment may compromise the findings. OBJECTIVE: To establish a comparison between treatment with conventional complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures in elderly patients by conducting a literature review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of English language peer-review literature was completed using Medline up to 2008 focusing on evidence-based research. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and longitudinal prospective studies were favoured in the review, using a general hierarchical classification. Articles that did not focus exclusively on the comparison of patient satisfaction between complete dentures and overdentures were excluded from further evaluation. The last search was conducted in February 2008. Key terms included quality of life, patient satisfaction, edentulism, complete denture and overdenture. RESULTS: Among the 90 articles found in the initial search, 27 met the inclusion criteria. This included 18 RCTs and eight prospective and one cohort study. Most of the articles stated superiority of the mandibular implant-retained overdenture therapy over the conventional complete denture regarding patient satisfaction and quality of life. CONCLUSION: Even with implant treatment presenting higher patient satisfaction and improvement of quality of life, it was not possible to establish a direct comparison between the studies due to differences in adopted methodologies.
机译:背景:已有研究表明,下颌覆盖义齿比常规义齿更令人满意,但是与使用回顾性评分,缺乏对照组和相继提供治疗有关的问题可能会损害研究结果。目的:通过文献综述,对老年患者使用常规全口义齿和保留义齿的义齿进行比较。材料和方法:截止到2008年,使用Medline完成了英语同行评审文献的搜索,重点是循证研究。该评价采用一般的分级分类法,倾向于随机临床试验(RCT)和纵向前瞻性研究。那些不完全侧重于全口义齿和全口义齿之间患者满意度比较的文章被排除在进一步评估之外。上次搜索是在2008年2月进行的。关键词包括生活质量,患者满意度,无牙病,全口义齿和覆盖义齿。结果:在最初搜索的90篇文章中,有27篇符合纳入标准。这包括18项RCT,8项前瞻性研究和一项队列研究。大多数文章指出,就患者满意度和生活质量而言,下颌种植体固位覆盖义齿治疗优于传统的全口义齿。结论:即使采用植入物治疗可提高患者满意度并改善生活质量,由于采用的方法不同,也无法在研究之间建立直接比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号