首页> 外文期刊>Food Policy >Agricultural growth, poverty reduction and agro-ecological zones in India: an ecological fallacy?
【24h】

Agricultural growth, poverty reduction and agro-ecological zones in India: an ecological fallacy?

机译:印度的农业增长,减贫和农业生态区:生态谬误?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In an article in this journal that is part of an oevre that has been widely cited Shenggen Fan, Peter Hazel and T. Haque (2000a) present evidence that government investments in India now have greater effects on poverty in rainfed than irrigated regions. This note suggests that parts of the methodology on which this claim is based are unclear and possibly suffer from an ecological fallacy. Even after clarification of their method by the authors, some doubts remain as to whether the results quoted support the original claim
机译:在该期刊的一篇文章中,该文章被广泛引用,是盛根凡(Shenggen Fan),彼得·黑兹尔(Peter Hazel)和T.·哈克(T. Haque,2000a)的证据,表明政府在印度的投资现在对雨养地区的贫困比灌溉地区的影响更大。本说明表明,此主张所基于的方法论的某些部分尚不清楚,并且可能遭受生态谬论的困扰。即使在作者澄清了他们的方法之后,对于所引用的结果是否支持原始主张仍存在一些疑问。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号