首页> 外文期刊>Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica: official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) >Perturbation measures of voice: a comparative study between Multi-Dimensional Voice Program and Praat.
【24h】

Perturbation measures of voice: a comparative study between Multi-Dimensional Voice Program and Praat.

机译:语音的摄动量度:多维语音程序和Praat的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Frequency and amplitude perturbations are inherent in voice acoustic signals. The assessment of voice perturbation is influenced by several factors, including the type of recording equipment used and the measurement extraction algorithm applied. In the present study, perturbation measures provided by two computer systems (a purpose-built professional voice analysis apparatus and a personal computer-based system for acoustic voice assessment) and two computer programs (Multi-Dimensional Voice Program and Praat) were compared. METHODS: Correlations and inferential statistics for seven perturbation measures (absolute jitter, percent jitter, relative average perturbation, pitch perturbation quotient, shimmer in decibels, percent shimmer, and amplitude perturbation quotient) in 50 subjects with various voice disorders are presented. RESULTS: Results indicate statistically significant differences between the two systems and programs, with the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program yielding consistently higher measures than Praat. Furthermore, correlation analyses show weak to moderate proportional relationships between the two systems and weak to strong proportional relationships between the two programs. CONCLUSION: Based on the literature and the proportional relationships and differences between the two systems and programs under consideration in this study, one can state that one can hardly compare frequency perturbation outcomes across systems and programs and amplitude perturbation outcomes across systems.
机译:背景/目的:频率和幅度扰动是语音声学信号中固有的。语音扰动的评估受几个因素的影响,包括使用的录音设备的类型和使用的测量提取算法。在本研究中,比较了由两个计算机系统(一个专用的专业语音分析设备和一个基于个人计算机的系统进行声学语音评估)和两个计算机程序(多维语音程序和Praat)提供的摄动措施。方法:介绍了50种不同语音障碍受试者的7种扰动测量值(绝对抖动,抖动百分比,相对平均扰动,音调​​扰动商,微分贝的微光,百分比微光和幅度微商)的相关性和推论统计。结果:结果表明两个系统和程序之间在统计学上有显着差异,其中多维语音程序产生的度量始终高于Praat。此外,相关性分析显示了两个系统之间的弱到中等比例关系以及两个程序之间的弱到强比例关系。结论:根据文献以及本研究中所考虑的两个系统和程序之间的比例关系和差异,人们可以说,人们几乎无法比较整个系统和程序之间的频率扰动结果和整个系统之间的幅度扰动结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号