【24h】

Fertility clinic, egg donation agency, and sperm bank policies.

机译:生育诊所,卵子捐赠机构和精子库政策。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of openness in U.S. gamete donation policies across fertility clinics, egg donation agencies, and sperm banks. DESIGN: Primarily a content analysis of organizational materials (e.g., websites, brochures). SETTING: Not applicable. PARTICIPANT(S): A total of 219 fertility clinics, 100 egg donation agencies, and 30 sperm banks. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Use of donor photographs, anonymity between parties, cycle outcome disclosure, and postcycle contact. RESULT(S): Agencies were more likely to provide donor photographs, have proactive policies to inform donors of the cycle outcome, and have nonanonymous options compared with sperm banks and clinics. Sperm banks were more likely to offer institutionalized donor identity-release programs. CONCLUSION(S): Clinics, agencies, and sperm banks have different policies to address the level of openness between donors, recipients, and donor-conceived children. Although agencies generally offer more open arrangements, only a minority of organizations restricted all types of contact and communication between parties.
机译:目的:评估生育诊所,卵子捐赠机构和精子库在美国配子捐赠政策中的开放程度。设计:主要是对组织资料(例如网站,小册子)进行内容分析。设置:不适用。参与者:总共219个生育诊所,100个卵子捐赠机构和30个精子库。干预措施:不适用。主要观察指标:使用捐赠者照片,当事方之间的匿名性,周期结果披露和周期后联系。结果:与精子库和诊所相比,代理商更可能提供捐赠者照片,制定积极的政策告知捐赠者周期结果以及具有匿名选择。精子银行更有可能提供制度化的捐助者身份释放计划。结论:诊所,机构和精子库有不同的政策来解决捐赠者,接受者和捐赠者所怀孩子之间的开放程度。尽管代理商通常会提供更为开放的安排,但是只有少数组织限制了各方之间的所有联系和沟通。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号