首页> 外文期刊>Fertility and Sterility: Official Journal of the American Fertility Society, Pacific Coast Fertility Society, and the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society >Does coasting, a procedure to avoid ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, affect assisted reproduction cycle outcome?
【24h】

Does coasting, a procedure to avoid ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, affect assisted reproduction cycle outcome?

机译:滑行,一种避免卵巢过度刺激综合征的程序,会影响辅助生殖周期的结果吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of coasting (withdrawing gonadotropin administration) on IVF outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Department of Infertility of Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Research and Education Hospital. PATIENT(S): Ninety-four patients in whom coasting was applied (group 1). One control group consisted of 22 patients in whom coasting was not applied despite E(2) > 3000 pg/mL (group 2). A control group consisted of 111 normally responsive patients with peak E(2) < 3000 pg/mL level (group 3). INTERVENTION(S): When E(2) levels were greater than 3000 pg/mL in the presence of at least 20 follicles, each measuring >or=10 mm in diameter with >or=20% of them of diameter >or=15 mm, recombinant FSH administration was discontinued while GnRH agonist was maintained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Hormonal characteristics, IVF outcome, OHSS in coasted and noncoasted groups. RESULT(S): There was no statistically significant difference between number of total oocytes retrieved, metaphase II oocytes, and fertilization rates among the group 1 vs. group 2. However, the implantation rates and pregnancy rates were significantly higher in group 1 compared with group 2. Group 1 had more total oocytes retrieved and metaphase II oocytes compared with group 3. However, there was no significant difference in implantation and pregnancy rates between groups 1 and 3. CONCLUSION(S): Coasting does not adversely affect assisted reproductive technology outcome and can be applied safely to high responder patients in ICSI.
机译:目的:评估滑行(退出促性腺激素)对IVF结局的影响。设计:回顾性研究。地点:泽凯·塔希尔·布拉克妇女健康研究与教育医院不育系。患者:94名应用滑行的患者(第1组)。一个对照组由22名患者组成,尽管E(2)> 3000 pg / mL,但仍未进行惯性滑行(第2组)。对照组由111名正常反应患者组成,其峰值E(2)<3000 pg / mL(第3组)。干预:当存在至少20个卵泡时,当E(2)水平大于3000 pg / mL时,每个卵泡的直径均大于或等于10毫米,其中大于或等于20%的直径大于或等于15 mm,在维持GnRH激动剂的同时中断了重组FSH的给药。主要观察指标:沿海和非沿海地区的激素特性,IVF结局,OHSS。结果:第1组与第2组之间的总卵母细胞数,中期II卵母细胞和受精率之间无统计学差异。但是,与第1组相比,第1组的着床率和妊娠率显着高于第2组。第2组。与第3组相比,第1组的总卵母细胞和中期II卵母细胞更多。但是,第1组和第3组之间的着床率和妊娠率没有显着差异。结论:滑行对辅助生殖技术没有不利影响结果,可以安全地应用于ICSI的高反应患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号