首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering >Field performance comparison of asphalt crack-filling materials: hot pour versus cold pour
【24h】

Field performance comparison of asphalt crack-filling materials: hot pour versus cold pour

机译:沥青裂缝填充材料的现场性能比较:热浇与冷浇

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

One of the most important components of pavement maintenance has been the sealing of cracks. The most commonly used materials for crack sealing are hot-pour sealants, such as hot rubber asphalt. However, this material can be hazardous at high operating temperatures and is more likely to be picked up by vehicle tires if the sealant is not sufficiently adhered to the pavement. Thus, cold-pour sealants have been considered as an alternative for crack sealing purposes. This study aims to compare the performance of hot-pour rubber asphalt crack sealant and cold-pour asphalt emulsion crack sealant in five different Texas districts that experience different weather conditions. The comparison includes seven different crack sealants: three cold pour and four hot pour. Five different roads in five districts were selected for comparison of the sealants. The field study results indicate that hot-pour sealants performed better than cold-pour sealants.
机译:路面维护最重要的组成部分之一就是裂缝的密封。用于裂缝密封的最常用材料是热浇注密封胶,例如热橡胶沥青。但是,这种材料在高工作温度下可能很危险,如果密封胶没有充分粘附到路面上,则很容易被车辆轮胎吸收。因此,冷灌封胶已被认为是裂缝密封的替代选择。这项研究的目的是在天气条件不同的五个得克萨斯州地区比较热浇注橡胶沥青裂缝密封胶和冷浇筑沥青乳液裂缝密封胶的性能。比较包括七种不同的裂缝密封胶:三种冷灌和四种热灌。选择了五个地区的五条不同道路,以比较密封胶。现场研究结果表明,热浇注密封胶的性能优于冷浇注密封胶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号