...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering >Comparison of risk-based optimization models for reservoir management
【24h】

Comparison of risk-based optimization models for reservoir management

机译:基于风险的水库管理优化模型比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Risk minimization in stochastic systems is a challenging problem and this paper compares results of three different techniques in reservoir management. Two-stage stochastic programming (TSP) for maximizing expected benefits is a well-known method, Fletcher and Ponnambalam (FP) and Q-Learning are the two new methods in reservoir management,all of which can include risk minimization in the objective function. The water price uncertainties caused by deregulated markets are considered in addition to random inflows in optimization and simulation is used to compare the results and to develop a risk versus return trade-off curve. One of the contributions of this paper is to consider risk in the QLearning algorithm.
机译:随机系统中的风险最小化是一个具有挑战性的问题,本文比较了三种不同技术在油藏管理中的结果。最大化预期收益的两阶段随机规划(TSP)是众所周知的方法,Fletcher和Ponnambalam(FP)和Q-Learning是储层管理中的两种新方法,所有这些方法都可以在目标函数中实现风险最小化。除了优化中的随机流入外,还考虑了市场管制放松造成的水价不确定性,并使用模拟来比较结果并绘制风险与收益的权衡曲线。本文的贡献之一是在QLearning算法中考虑风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号