首页> 外文期刊>Fertility and Sterility: Official Journal of the American Fertility Society, Pacific Coast Fertility Society, and the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society >A randomized trial comparing monopolar electrodes using glycine 1.5% with two different types of bipolar electrodes (TCRis, Versapoint) using saline, in hysteroscopic surgery.
【24h】

A randomized trial comparing monopolar electrodes using glycine 1.5% with two different types of bipolar electrodes (TCRis, Versapoint) using saline, in hysteroscopic surgery.

机译:一项在宫腔镜手术中比较使用1.5%甘氨酸的单极电极和使用盐水的两种不同类型的双极电极(TCRis,Versapoint)的随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare three types of equipment during hysteroscopic resection. DESIGN: A randomized study. SETTING: Women's clinic at Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. PATIENT(S): Two hundred premenopausal women with menorrhagia caused by dysfunctional bleedings, fibroids, or polyps. INTERVENTION(S): Hysteroscopic resection was performed either with monopolar electrodes using glycine 1.5% as irrigant or with two different types of bipolar electrodes (TCRis; Olympus, Hamburg, Germany and Versapoint; Gynecare, Menlo Park, CA) using saline as irrigant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Change in serum sodium as a result of irrigant consumption, operating time, and amount of tissue removed. RESULT(S): A statistically significant reduction in mean serum sodium from 138.7 mmol/L to 133.8 mmol/L was seen in the monopolar group, compared with the case of the saline groups with no reduction. The amount of resected tissue in the monopolar and TCRis group was approximately 1.00 g/min, compared with 0.65 g/min in the Versapoint group. Loss of fluid during the procedure was significantly higher in the two bipolar groups. CONCLUSION(S): Bipolar electrodes appear to have a safer profile compared with monopolar electrodes because of the unchanged serum sodium. Irrigant consumption was significantly higher in the two bipolar groups, without any side effects during or after the procedure. Furthermore, the TCRis loop appears to be superior to the Versapoint loop, as regards operating time and amount of tissue removed.
机译:目的:比较宫腔镜切除术中三种类型的设备。设计:一项随机研究。地点:挪威奥斯陆Ullevaal大学医院的女性诊所。患者:200名绝经前妇女因功能失调性出血,肌瘤或息肉导致月经过多。干预:宫腔镜切除术是使用1.5%甘氨酸作为冲洗液的单极电极或使用两种不同类型的双极电极(TCRis;德国汉堡的Olympus; Versapoint;加利福尼亚州Menlo Park的Gynecare;使用盐水作为冲洗液)进行的宫腔镜切除术。主要观察指标:由于冲洗剂消耗,手术时间和清除的组织数量而导致的血清钠变化。结果:与生理盐水组相比,单极组的平均血清钠含量从138.7 mmol / L降低到133.8 mmol / L,具有统计学意义。单极和TCRis组的切除组织量约为1.00 g / min,而Versapoint组为0.65 g / min。在该过程中,两个双极组的体液流失明显更高。结论:双极性电极似乎具有比单极性电极更安全的特性,因为血清钠没有变化。两个双极组的冲洗剂消耗量明显更高,在手术过程中或手术后没有任何副作用。此外,就手术时间和切除的组织数量而言,TCRis循环似乎优于Versapoint循环。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号