首页> 外文期刊>California Fish and Game >A COMPARISON OF CATCH RATE BETWEEN A TRADITIONAL, BASKET-STYLE HOOP NET AND A RIGID, CONICAL-STYLE HOOP NET USED IN THE CALIFORNIA RECREATIONAL LOBSTER FISHERY
【24h】

A COMPARISON OF CATCH RATE BETWEEN A TRADITIONAL, BASKET-STYLE HOOP NET AND A RIGID, CONICAL-STYLE HOOP NET USED IN THE CALIFORNIA RECREATIONAL LOBSTER FISHERY

机译:传统式篮筐网和加利福尼亚游乐龙虾渔业中使用的刚性,圆锥形篮网的捕获率比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We compared the relative catch efficiencies of two types of hoop net commonly used in the recreational California Spiny Lobster fishery. One net type is basket shaped but lies flat on the bottom during deployment and represents the traditional hoop net design. The other type is a recent development that maintains its rigid, conical shape during both deployment and recovery. Our study took place at Zuniga Jetty, a submerged rock jetty in San Diego, over 7 nights in August/September, 2008. A total of 96 nets (48 of each type) were deployed. Catches of the two net types differed with the rigid hoop nets catching 57% more lobster total than the traditional hoop nets (Rigid:Traditional = 259:165 lobsters caught). In addition to lobster, deployment of both styles of nets resulted in bycatch of various finfish and invertebrate species. This increased catch efficiency of a net type that is growing in popularity, coupled with increases in access to lobsters, interest in lobster fishing, and marketing of hoop nets, has the potential of enlarging recreational catch.
机译:我们比较了休闲加州棘刺龙虾渔业中常用的两种类型的网箍的相对捕捞效率。一种网状为篮形,但在部署过程中平放在底部,代表了传统的环网设计。另一种是最近的发展,在部署和恢复期间都保持其刚性,圆锥形的形状。我们的研究在2008年8月/ 9月的7个晚上在圣地亚哥的一个水下岩石码头Zuniga码头进行。共部署了96个蚊帐(每种类型48个)。两种网的捕获方式有所不同,刚性圈网捕获的龙虾比传统圈网多捕获57%(刚性:传统= 259:165,捕获的龙虾)。除龙虾外,两种样式的网布的部署还导致多种鱼类和无脊椎动物物种的兼捕。这种网状捕捞效率的提高日益流行,加上对龙虾的获取,对龙虾捕捞的兴趣以及环网的销售,都有可能增加休闲捕捞的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号