...
首页> 外文期刊>Early human development >Inter- and intra-observer agreement of Prechtl's method on the qualitative assessment of general movements in preterm, term and young infants.
【24h】

Inter- and intra-observer agreement of Prechtl's method on the qualitative assessment of general movements in preterm, term and young infants.

机译:Prechtl方法对早产,足月和幼儿总体运动进行定性评估的观察者间和观察者内协议。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Prechtl's method on the qualitative assessment of general movements (GMs) has been shown to be a good predictor of neurological outcome. There is substantial evidence that this method has good inter- and intra-observer agreement. AIMS: We wanted to find out whether this high agreement is reproducible in the clinical setting. STUDY DESIGN: Reliability study (inter- and intra-observer agreement). SUBJECTS: Twenty video-sequences of children at the age of preterm and writhing movements (31-41 weeks postmenstrual age) and 10 video-sequences of children at the fidgety movements age (49-54 weeks postmenstrual age) were rated by five physiotherapists. OUTCOME MEASURES: Intra- and inter-observer agreements were analyzed with percentage agreement and with nominal kappa statistic with bootstrapped bias corrected 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: We found fair to substantial inter-observer reliability for the six response categories (time-point 1(t1): median kappa 0.44, range 0.27 to 0.59, time-point 2 (t2): median kappa 0.55, range 0.41 to 0.77) and fair to almost perfect for the normal/abnormal ratings (t1: median kappa 0.53, range 0.29 to 0.61, t2: median kappa 0.63, range 0.29 to 0.85). There was statistically significant improvement from t1 to t2 for the six response categories. The intra-observer reliability for the 9-week interval was moderate to almost perfect (median kappa 0.68, range 0.41 to 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: We were not able to exactly reproduce the generally very good results. In our clinical setting now videos are evaluated by at least two trained therapists and the results are discussed, if necessary, to reach a consensus.
机译:背景:Prechtl的对一般运动(GMs)进行定性评估的方法已被证明是神经系统预后的良好预测指标。有大量证据表明该方法在观察者之间和观察者内部具有良好的一致性。目的:我们想了解这种高度一致的结果在临床环境中是否可重现。研究设计:可靠性研究(观察者之间和观察者之间的协议)。研究对象:五名物理治疗师对早产和扭动年龄的孩子(月经后31-41周)的二十个视频序列和躁狂性运动年龄(月经后的49-54周)的儿童十个视频序列进行了评估。观察指标:观察者之间和观察者之间的协议采用百分比协议和名义kappa统计量进行分析,并采用自举偏差校正95%的置信区间。结果:我们发现六个响应类别的观察者之间的可靠性基本相同(时间点1(t1):中位数kappa 0.44,范围0.27至0.59,时间点2(t2):中位数kappa 0.55,范围0.41至0.77 ),对于正常/异常评级来说,是相当理想的(t1:中位数kappa 0.53,范围0.29至0.61,t2:中位数kappa 0.63,范围0.29至0.85)。六个响应类别从t1到t2在统计上有显着改善。 9周间隔内的观察者内部可靠性中等至几乎完美(中位数kappa为0.68,范围为0.41至0.86)。结论:我们不能准确地再现通常非常好的结果。在我们的临床环境中,现在至少由两名训练有素的治疗师对视频进行评估,并在必要时讨论结果以达成共识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号