首页> 外文期刊>Ear, nose and throat journal >A comparison of techniques for evaluating IgE-mediated allergies.
【24h】

A comparison of techniques for evaluating IgE-mediated allergies.

机译:评价IgE介导的过敏的技术比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Skin prick testing remains the most popular way to confirm an IgE-mediated allergic response. This study was performed to compare the accuracy and sensitivity of two skin testing modalities (serial endpoint titration and skin prick testing with 2 different in vitro assays). In 52 atopic patients serial endpoint titration showed a higher degree of sensitivity in evaluating skin response in less sensitive reactors. At higher degrees of reactivity in individual patients there was good correlation between the 3 modalities. Identifying patients who are less sensitive reactors is important, so that they can be started on immunotherapy. In fact, an informal survey of low-reacting patients treated with immunotherapy showed a high degree of success.
机译:皮肤点刺测试仍然是确认IgE介导的过敏反应的最流行方法。进行这项研究的目的是比较两种皮肤测试方法(使用两种不同的体外测定方法进行的血清终点滴定和皮肤点刺测试)的准确性和敏感性。在52名特应性患者中,连续终点滴定法显示了在较不敏感的反应器中评估皮肤反应时的敏感性更高。在个别患者中,较高的反应度在3种方式之间具有良好的相关性。识别反应器敏感性较低的患者很重要,以便可以开始免疫治疗。实际上,对接受免疫疗法治疗的低反应患者的非正式调查显示出很高的成功率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号