首页> 外文期刊>Gut: Journal of the British Society of Gastroenterology >Response to fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma versus conventional hepatocellular carcinoma: Better 5-year survival or artefactual result of research methodology?
【24h】

Response to fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma versus conventional hepatocellular carcinoma: Better 5-year survival or artefactual result of research methodology?

机译:对纤维状层状肝细胞癌与常规肝细胞癌的反应:更好的5年生存率或研究方法的人工结果?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We are grateful for the opportunity to reply to Dr Njei's letter, which raised the question of whether a better 5-year survival for patients with fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (fHCC) versus patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (that we recently reported), was real or an artefact of research methodology.1 In the letter, results of a meta-analysis were presented which were interpreted to show that the survival of fHCC and HCC do not differ in non-cirrhotic patients. We disagree with this interpretation of the results.
机译:我们很高兴有机会回复Njei博士的信,该信提出了一个问题,即纤维状层状肝细胞癌(fHCC)患者比肝细胞癌(HCC)患者(我们最近报道)的5年生存率是否更高1在信中,提出了荟萃分析的结果,这些结果被解释为表明,非肝硬化患者中fHCC和HCC的生存率没有差异。我们不同意这种对结果的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号