...
首页> 外文期刊>Glass & glazing products >Need to avoid likely BFRC monopoly and limited choice
【24h】

Need to avoid likely BFRC monopoly and limited choice

机译:需要避免可能的BFRC垄断和有限的选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

REHAU has long supported the British Fenestration Ratings Council (BFRC) window energy rating (WER) scheme as a marketing tool for installers and I genuinely think it is a nice idea for end users in helping them to visualise the relative differences in window thermal performance.However, what is not a good idea, in my opinion, is using the scheme to make a technically sound assessment for the overall energy performance of a building. Yet, this is exactly what is being proposed in the new Building Regulations which would see WER ratings as the only criteria for demonstrating Part L compliance in replacement windows.
机译:REHAU长期以来一直支持英国窗式额定值评定委员会(BFRC)的窗能额定值(WER)计划作为安装人员的营销工具,我真的认为对于最终用户来说,这是一个不错的主意,可以帮助他们可视化窗玻璃热性能的相对差异。但是,我认为,使用该方案对建筑物的整体能源性能进行技术上合理的评估并不是一个好主意。但是,这正是新《建筑法规》中提出的内容,它将把WER等级视为在更换窗户中证明L部分合规性的唯一标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号