A Rasch analysis of patients' opinions of primary health care professionals' ethical behaviour with respect to communication issues

Gonzalez-de Paz Luis; Kostov Belchin; Lopez-Pina Jose A.; Solans-Julian Pilar; Dolors Navarro-Rubio M.; Siso-Almirall Antoni

首页> 外文期刊>Family practice. >A Rasch analysis of patients' opinions of primary health care professionals' ethical behaviour with respect to communication issues

【24h】

A Rasch analysis of patients' opinions of primary health care professionals' ethical behaviour with respect to communication issues

机译：Rasch分析患者对初级保健专业人员在沟通问题上的道德行为的看法

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Background: Patients' opinions are crucial in assessing the effectiveness of the ethical theories which underlie the care relationship between patients and primary health care professionals. Objectives: To study the ethical behaviour of primary health care professionals with respect to communication issues according to patients' opinions.

机译：背景：患者的意见对于评估伦理理论的有效性至关重要，伦理理论是患者与初级卫生保健专业人员之间的护理关系的基础。目的：根据患者的意见，研究初级保健专业人员在沟通问题方面的道德行为。

著录项

来源
《Family practice.》 |2015年第2期|共7页
作者
Gonzalez-de Paz Luis; Kostov Belchin; Lopez-Pina Jose A.; Solans-Julian Pilar; Dolors Navarro-Rubio M.; Siso-Almirall Antoni;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类预防医学、卫生学;
关键词
Ethics; ethical conduct; patients; primary health care; professional-patient relationship;

机译：伦理;道德操守;病人;初级卫生保健;医患关系;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. A Rasch analysis of patients' opinions of primary health care professionals' ethical behaviour with respect to communication issues [J] . Gonzalez-de Paz Luis, Kostov Belchin, Lopez-Pina Jose A., Family practice. . 2015,第2期

机译：Rasch分析患者对初级保健专业人员在沟通问题上的道德行为的看法
2. Do patients and health care professionals view the communication processes of clinical research differently? A Rasch analysis from a survey [J] . Gonzalez-de Paz Luis, Kostov Belchin, Solans-Julian Pilar, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice . 2015,第5期

机译：患者和卫生保健专业人员对临床研究的交流过程是否有所不同？来自调查的Rasch分析
3. Do patients and health care professionals view the communication processes of clinical research differently? A Rasch analysis from a survey [J] . Gonzalez-de Paz Luis, Kostov Belchin, Solans-Julian Pilar, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice . 2015,第5期

机译：患者和卫生保健专业人员对临床研究的交流过程是否有所不同？来自调查的Rasch分析
4. The Role of Electronic Health Records in Improving Communication Between Health Professionals in Primary Healthcare Centres in Riyadh: Perception of Health Professionals [C] . Ber Alanazi, Kerryn Butler-Henderson, Mohammed R. Alanazi MEDINFO . 2019

机译：电子健康记录在利雅得初级医疗中心卫生专业人士沟通中的作用：卫生专业人员的看法
5. Health Care Professionals–Patient Communication: Oh! But It’s Small, Inducted into the Pink Ribbon Club! An Autoethnographic Study of My Experience with Health Care Professionals during Breast Cancer Treatment [D] . Johnson, Renita T. 2020

机译：医疗保健专业人士 - 患者沟通：哦！但它很小，进入粉红丝带俱乐部！在乳腺癌治疗期间对医疗专业人士的经验进行自动征研究
6. Need for information honesty and respect: patient perspectives on health care professionals communication about cancer and fertility [O] . Jane M. Ussher, Chloe Parton, Janette Perz 2018

机译：需要信息诚实和尊重：患者对卫生保健专业人员的看法有关癌症和生育能力的交流
7. Renal insufficiency and anemia are independent risk factors for death among patients with acute myocardial infarction1,21As published material, the contents of this manuscript may not be cited, quoted, reproduced or published without the consent of the authors.2The analyses upon which this publication is based were performed under Contract Number 500-96-P704, entitled “Operation Utilization and Quality Control Peer Review Organization (PRO) for the State of Georgia” and sponsored by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Department of Health and Human Services. The conclusions and opinions expressed, and methods used herein are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect CMS policy. The authors assume full responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the ideas presented. This article is a direct result of the Health Care Quality Improvement Program initiated by CMS, which has encouraged identification of quality improvement projects derived from analysis of patterns of care, and therefore required no special funding on the part of this Contractor. Ideas and contributions to the authors concerning experience in engaging with issues presented are welcomed. [O] . Langston Robert D., Presley Rodney, Flanders W. Dana, 2003

机译：肾功能不全和贫血是急性心肌梗死患者死亡的独立危险因素1,21作为已发表的材料，未经作者的同意，不得引用，引用，复制或出版该手稿的内容。2本出版物所依据的分析这些工作是根据合同号500-96-P704进行的，该合同的标题为“佐治亚州的运营利用和质量控制同行评审组织（PRO）”，由卫生与人文部医疗保险和医疗补助中心（CMS）赞助服务。所表达的结论和意见以及本文使用的方法均为作者的结论和意见。它们不一定反映CMS政策。作者对所提出想法的准确性和完整性承担全部责任。本文是CMS发起的“医疗保健质量改善计划”的直接结果，该计划鼓励鉴定通过对护理模式进行分析而得出的质量改善项目，因此该承包商不需要任何特殊资金。欢迎作者提出解决问题的经验和想法。

A Rasch analysis of patients' opinions of primary health care professionals' ethical behaviour with respect to communication issues

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅