【24h】

Reply to Milgrom and Moebius.

机译:回复米尔格罗姆和莫比乌斯。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

My article was invited by the Editor of the Journal and did indeed mention a comprehensive homeopathic research programme which was conducted during the Third Reich. Milgrom and Moebius ask'why raise the issue... now?'. The question is misleading. I (and many others) have referred to this programme many times before. There are more than 1000 websites on Google about this. Years ago, I even wrote an article specifically dedicated to this subject in the UK homeopaths'journal ,and it was I who decided 18 years ago to publish Donner's detailed eye-witness account of the programme in my journal Perfusion [2-5]. 'Why now' is therefore a nonsensical question. Why again, would be better - and the answer is, because it may be important, both historically and scientifically.
机译:我的文章受《日刊》编辑的邀请,确实提到了在第三帝国时期进行的一项全面的顺势疗法研究计划。米尔格罗姆和莫比乌斯问:“为什么现在提这个问题?”。这个问题是误导的。我(和许多其他人)之前已经多次提及该程序。 Google上有1000多个网站。几年前,我什至在英国顺势疗法杂志上写了一篇专门针对这一主题的文章,正是我18年前决定在我的《 Perfusion》杂志上发表Donner关于该程序的详细目击者陈述[2-5]。因此,“为什么现在”是一个荒谬的问题。为什么又会更好呢?答案是,因为它可能在历史上和科学上都很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号