首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >What are validated self-report adherence scales really measuring?: A systematic review
【24h】

What are validated self-report adherence scales really measuring?: A systematic review

机译:经过验证的自我报告遵守量表真正可以衡量什么?:系统回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aims Medication non-adherence is a significant health problem. There are numerous methods for measuring adherence, but no single method performs well on all criteria. The purpose of this systematic review is to (i) identify self-report medication adherence scales that have been correlated with comparison measures of medication-taking behaviour, (ii) assess how these scales measure adherence and (iii) explore how these adherence scales have been validated. Methods Cinahl and PubMed databases were used to search articles written in English on the development or validation of medication adherence scales dating to August 2012. The search terms used were medication adherence, medication non-adherence, medication compliance and names of each scale. Data such as barriers identified and validation comparison measures were extracted and compared. Results Sixty articles were included in the review, which consisted of 43 adherence scales. Adherence scales include items that either elicit information regarding the patient's medication-taking behaviour and/or attempts to identify barriers to good medication-taking behaviour or beliefs associated with adherence. The validation strategies employed depended on whether the focus of the scale was to measure medication-taking behaviour or identify barriers or beliefs. Conclusions Supporting patients to be adherent requires information on their medication-taking behaviour, barriers to adherence and beliefs about medicines. Adherence scales have the potential to explore these aspects of adherence, but currently there has been a greater focus on measuring medication-taking behaviour. Selecting the 'right' adherence scale(s) requires consideration of what needs to be measured and how (and in whom) the scale has been validated.
机译:目的药物不依从是一个重大的健康问题。有多种方法可以测量依从性,但没有一种方法可以在所有条件下都表现良好。该系统评价的目的是(i)找出与服用药物行为比较措施相关的自我报告药物依从性量表,(ii)评估这些量表如何测量依从性,以及(iii)探索这些依从性量表如何经过验证。方法使用Cinahl和PubMed数据库搜索以英语撰写的有关药物依从性量表的制定或验证的文章,该文献可追溯至2012年8月。使用的搜索词为药物依从性,药物不依从性,药物依从性和各个量表的名称。提取并比较了诸如识别障碍和验证比较措施等数据。结果该评价共纳入60篇文章,共43项依从性评分。遵守量表包括以下项目:这些项目会得出有关患者的用药行为的信息和/或试图确定妨碍良好用药行为的障碍或与依从性相关的信念的项目。所采用的验证策略取决于量表的重点是衡量服用药物的行为还是确定障碍或信念。结论支持患者依从性需要有关其服药行为,依从性障碍和对药物的信念的信息。依从性量表具有探索依从性的这些方面的潜力,但是目前,人们越来越重视测量用药行为。选择“正确的”遵守量表需要考虑需要衡量的内容以及如何(以及在​​谁中)验证量表。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号