首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >Medication reviews for nursing home residents to reduce mortality and hospitalization: Systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Medication reviews for nursing home residents to reduce mortality and hospitalization: Systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:为养老院居民降低死亡率和住院治疗的药物复查:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aims Medication reviews by a third party have been introduced as a method to improve drug treatment in older people. We assessed whether this intervention reduces mortality and hospitalization for nursing home residents. Methods Systematic literature searches were performed (from January 1990 to June 2012) in Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Sources and Health Technology Assessment databases. We included randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials (RCTs and non-RCTs) of medication reviews compared with standard care or other types of medication reviews in nursing home residents. The outcome variables were mortality and hospitalization. Study quality was assessed systematically. We performed meta-analyses using random-effects models. Results Seven RCTs and five non-RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean age of included patients varied between 78 and 86 years. They were treated with a mean of 4-12 drugs. The study quality was assessed as high (n = 1), moderate (n = 4) or low (n = 7). Eight studies compared medication reviews with standard care. In six of them, pharmacists were involved in the intervention. Meta-analyses of RCTs revealed a risk ratio (RR) for mortality of 1.03 [medication reviews vs. standard care; five trials; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-1.23]. The corresponding RR for hospitalization was 1.07 (two trials; 95% CI 0.61-1.87). Conclusions Our findings indicate that medication reviews for nursing home residents do not reduce mortality or hospitalization. More research in the setting of controlled trials remains to be done in order to clarify how drug treatment can be optimized for these patients.
机译:引入了第三方的药物审查目的,作为改善老年人药物治疗的一种方法。我们评估了这种干预措施是否降低了疗养院居民的死亡率和住院率。方法(1990年1月至2012年6月),在Medline,EMBASE,Cochrane图书馆,ProQuest护理及相关健康资源和健康技术评估数据库中进行系统的文献检索。我们纳入了药物评论与标准护理或其他类型的药物评论相比,在疗养院居民中进行的随机和非随机对照试验(RCT和非RCT)。结果变量是死亡率和住院治疗。研究质量得到系统评估。我们使用随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析。结果七个RCT和五个非RCT符合纳入标准。纳入患者的平均年龄在78至86岁之间。他们平均接受了4-12种药物治疗。研究质量评估为高(n = 1),中度(n = 4)或低(n = 7)。八项研究将药物评论与标准护理进行了比较。在其中的六个中,药剂师参与了干预。对RCT的荟萃分析显示,死亡率为1.03 [药物评价与标准治疗对比;五次审判; 95%置信区间(CI)0.85-1.23]。住院的相应RR为1.07(两项试验; 95%CI 0.61-1.87)。结论我们的发现表明,对疗养院居民的用药审查不会降低死亡率或住院率。为了阐明如何为这些患者优化药物治疗,尚需开展更多的对照试验研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号