首页> 外文期刊>Bioinformatics >Comparison of algorithms for pre-processing of SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry data
【24h】

Comparison of algorithms for pre-processing of SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry data

机译:SELDI-TOF质谱数据预处理算法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Motivation: Surface-enhanced laser desorption and ionization (SELDI) time of flight (TOF) is a mass spectrometry technology. The key features in a mass spectrum are its peaks. In order to locate the peaks and quantify their intensities, several pre-processing steps are required. Though different approaches to perform pre-processing have been proposed, there is no systematic study that compares their performance.Results: In this article, we present the results of a systematic comparison of various popular packages for pre-processing of SELDI-TOF data. We evaluate their performance in terms of two of their primary functions: peak detection and peak quantification. Regarding peak quantification, the performance of the algorithms is measured in terms of reproducibility. For peak detection, the comparison is based on sensitivity and false discovery rate. Our results show that for spectra generated with low laser intensity, the software developed by Ciphergen Biosystems (ProteinChip Software 3.1 with the additional tool Biomarker Wizard) produces relatively good results for both peak quantification and detection. On the other hand, for the data produced with either medium or high laser intensity, none of the methods show uniformly better performances under both criteria. Our analysis suggests that an advantageous combination is the use of the packages MassSpecWavelet and PROcess, the former for peak detection and the latter for peak quantification.
机译:动机:表面增强的激光解吸和电离(SELDI)飞行时间(TOF)是一种质谱技术。质谱图中的关键特征是其峰。为了定位峰并量化其强度,需要几个预处理步骤。尽管已经提出了执行预处理的不同方法,但是没有系统的研究可以比较它们的性能。结果:在本文中,我们介绍了对SELDI-TOF数据进行预处理的各种流行软件包的系统比较结果。我们根据其两个主要功能评估其性能:峰检测和峰定量。关于峰量化,算法的性能是根据可重复性来衡量的。对于峰检测,比较基于灵敏度和错误发现率。我们的结果表明,对于以低激光强度生成的光谱,由Ciphergen Biosystems开发的软件(带有附加工具Biomarker Wizard的ProteinChip Software 3.1)对于峰定量和检测均产生相对较好的结果。另一方面,对于以中等或高激光强度产生的数据,两种方法均未显示出均一的更好性能。我们的分析表明,使用MassSpecWavelet和PROcess软件包是一种有利的组合,前者用于峰检测,而后者用于峰定量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号