...
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature >Comments on Scarabaeus Linnaeus, 1758, Dynastes MacLeay, 1819, carabaeinae Latreille, 1802, and dynastinae MacLeay, 1819 (Insecta, Coleoptera, scarabaeoidea): proposed conservation of usage (Case 3590; see BZN 69: 182-190, 293-295)
【24h】

Comments on Scarabaeus Linnaeus, 1758, Dynastes MacLeay, 1819, carabaeinae Latreille, 1802, and dynastinae MacLeay, 1819 (Insecta, Coleoptera, scarabaeoidea): proposed conservation of usage (Case 3590; see BZN 69: 182-190, 293-295)

机译:关于Scarabaeus Linnaeus(1758),Dynastes MacLeay(1819),carabaeinae Latreille(1802)和dynastinae MacLeay(1819)(Insecta,Coleoptera,scarabaeoidea)的评论:建议保留使用方法(Case 3590; BZN 69:182-190,293-295)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

I wish to register my strong support for conservation of the current usage of Scarabaeus and Dynastes and their associated higher taxa as proposed in Case 3590, but also wish to help clarify the matter of authorship of type designations in Jolyclerc (1807a, 1807b). Having obtained a copy of the original 1807 two-volume set, I have been researching this work and compiling a list of type designations in it and unfortunately misled the authors of this application when I advised them that the preface (page iii) had the information as to the authorship of Lamarck for the insect entries.
机译:我希望对案例3590中所建议的圣甲虫和王朝及其相关的较高生物分类的当前使用表示大力支持,但也希望有助于澄清Jolyclerc(1807a,1807b)中类型名称的作者问题。获得了原始的1807年两卷集的副本后,我一直在研究这项工作并在其中汇编一个类型名称列表,但不幸的是,当我告诉他们该序言(第iii页)中包含该信息时,误导了该申请的作者。关于拉马克(Lamarck)参与昆虫活动的著作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号