首页> 外文期刊>Genetics in medicine >Assessing educational priorities in genetics for general practitioners and specialists in five countries: factor structure of the Genetic-Educational Priorities (Gen-EP) scale.
【24h】

Assessing educational priorities in genetics for general practitioners and specialists in five countries: factor structure of the Genetic-Educational Priorities (Gen-EP) scale.

机译:为五个国家的全科医生和专家评估遗传学教育优先级:遗传教育优先级(Gen-EP)量表的要素结构。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: A scale assessing primary care physicians' priorities for genetic education (The Gen-EP scale) was developed and tested in five European countries. The objective of this study was to determine its factor structure, to test scaling assumptions and to determine internal consistency. METHODS: The sample consisted of 3686 practitioners (general practitioners, gyneco-obstetricians, pediatricians) sampled in France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, and United Kingdom. We first determined the factor structure of the Gen-EP scale (30 items) on the whole sample. Scaling assumptions were then tested on each country using multitrait scaling analysis. Internal consistency was assessed across the five countries. RESULTS: Six factors were identified accounting for 63.3% of the variance of the items. They represented the following priorities for genetic education: "Genetics of Common Diseases"; "Ethical, Legal, and Public Health Issues"; "Approaching Genetic Risk Assessment in Clinical Practice"; "Basic Genetics and Congenital Malformations"; "Techniques and Innovation in Genetics" and "Psychosocial and Counseling Issues." In each country, convergent and discriminant validity were satisfactory. Internal-consistency reliability coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) were all above the acceptable threshold (0.70). CONCLUSION: The Gen-EP scale could be a helpful instrument in different countries to organize and evaluate the impact of genetic educational programs for primary care providers.
机译:目的:在五个欧洲国家开发并测试了评估初级保健医师对基因教育的优先级的量表(Gen-EP量表)。这项研究的目的是确定其因素结构,测试比例假设并确定内部一致性。方法:样本由法国,德国,荷兰,瑞典和英国的3686名从业者(普通从业者,妇产科医师,儿科医师)组成。我们首先确定了整个样本中Gen-EP量表(30个项目)的因子结构。然后使用多特征尺度分析在每个国家/地区测试尺度假设。对五个国家的内部一致性进行了评估。结果:确定了六个因素,占项目差异的63.3%。它们代表了遗传教育的以下优先事项:“常见疾病的遗传学”; “道德,法律和公共卫生问题”; “在临床实践中进行遗传风险评估”; “基本遗传学和先天畸形”; “遗传学的技术和创新”和“社会心理与咨询问题”。在每个国家,聚合效度和判别效度都令人满意。内部一致性可靠性系数(Cronbach's alpha)均高于可接受的阈值(0.70)。结论:Gen-EP量表可能是在不同国家帮助组织和评估遗传教育计划对初级保健提供者的影响的有用工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号