首页> 外文期刊>Genetics in medicine >Taking aims seriously: Repository research and limits on the duty to return individual research findings
【24h】

Taking aims seriously: Repository research and limits on the duty to return individual research findings

机译:认真对待目标:存储库研究和返回单个研究结果的责任限制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Most discussions of researchers' duties to return incidental findings or research results to research participants or repository contributors fail to provide an adequate theoretical grounding for such duties. Returning findings is a positive duty, a duty to help somebody. Typically, such duties are specified narrowly such that helping is only a duty when it poses little or no risk or burden to the helper and does not interfere with her legitimate aims. Under current budgetary and personnel constraints, and with currently available information technology, routine return of individual findings from research using repository materials would constitute a substantial burden on the scientific enterprise and would seriously frustrate the aims of both scientists and specimen/data contributors. In most cases, researchers' limited duties to help repository contributors probably can be fulfilled by some action less demanding than returning individual findings. Furthermore, the duty-to-return issue should be analyzed as a conflict between (possibly) helping some contributors now and (possibly) helping a greater number of people who would benefit in the future from the knowledge produced by research.
机译:关于研究人员将偶然发现或研究结果返还给研究参与者或存储库贡献者的职责的大多数讨论都没有为此类职责提供足够的理论基础。返回调查结果是一项积极的责任,是帮助他人的责任。通常,此类职责的定义很狭such,以至于帮助仅是对助手造成很少或没有风险或负担,并且不会干扰其合法目标的职责。在当前的预算和人员限制下,以及在当前可用的信息技术的帮助下,使用存储库材料进行的常规研究结果的例行返回将给科学事业造成沉重负担,并将严重挫败科学家和标本/数据提供者的目标。在大多数情况下,研究人员在帮助信息库贡献者方面的有限职责可以通过比返回个人发现要求更少的行动来完成。此外,应将归还责任问题分析为(可能)现在帮助某些贡献者与(可能)帮助更多将来会从研究中获得的知识受益的人们之间的冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号