首页> 外文期刊>Geographical Journal >Impact of non-livelihood-based land management on land resources: The case of upland watersheds in Uporoto Mountains, South West Tanzania
【24h】

Impact of non-livelihood-based land management on land resources: The case of upland watersheds in Uporoto Mountains, South West Tanzania

机译:非基于生计的土地管理对土地资源的影响:以坦桑尼亚西南部乌波罗托山为代表的高地流域

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Various land management strategies are used to prevent land degradation and keep land productive. Often land management strategies applied in certain areas focus on the context of the physical environment but are incompatible with the social environment where they are applied. As a result, such strategies are ignored by land users and land degradation becomes difficult to control. This study observes the impacts of land management in the upland watersheds of the Uporoto Mountains in South West Tanzania. In spite of various land management practices used in the area, 38% of the studied area experienced soil fertility loss, 30% gully erosion, 23% soil loss, 6% biodiversity loss and drying up of river sources. Land management methods that were accepted and adopted were those contributing to immediate livelihood needs. These methods did not control land resource degradation, but increased crop output per unit of land and required little labour. Effective methods of controlling land degradation were abandoned or ignored because they did not satisfy immediate livelihood needs. This paper concludes that Integrating poor people's needs would transform non-livelihood-based land management methods to livelihood-based ones. Different ways of transforming these land management methods are presented and discussed.
机译:各种土地管理策略用于防止土地退化和保持土地生产力。在某些地区采用的土地管理策略通常侧重于自然环境,但与所采用的社会环境不符。结果,土地使用者忽略了这种策略,土地退化变得难以控制。本研究观察了坦桑尼亚西南部Uporoto山高地流域土地管理的影响。尽管该地区采用了各种土地管理方法,但仍有38%的研究区域遭受了土壤肥力损失,30%的沟壑侵蚀,23%的土壤损失,6%的生物多样性损失和河源枯竭。被接受和采用的土地管理方法是那些有助于当前生计需求的方法。这些方法不能控制土地资源的退化,但可以增加单位土地上的农作物产量,所需的劳动力很少。控制土地退化的有效方法被放弃或被忽略,因为它们不能满足当前的生计需求。本文的结论是,整合穷人的需求将把非以生计为基础的土地管理方法转变为以生计为基础的方法。提出并讨论了改变这些土地管理方法的不同方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号