...
首页> 外文期刊>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: Official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) >Comparison of perceptional nasal obstruction with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessment.
【24h】

Comparison of perceptional nasal obstruction with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessment.

机译:鼻测压法和声学鼻测法评估鼻塞的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Perception of nasal stuffiness, together with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessments were evaluated before and after nasal and/or sinus surgery in 50 Japanese adult patients. Nasal resistance on both expiration and inspiration correlated well with the patients' perceptions (P<0.05). Nasal volumes (0-4 cm and 0-7 cm) obtained from acoustic rhinometry measurements also correlated well with perception (P<0.05). No significant relationships were found between rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric results. Perceptional nasal obstruction, rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric results (except for the sectional areas at the I-notch) improved significantly after the operations. Rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry are valuable methods for assessing nasal stuffiness, but we must take account of the differences between the two methods.
机译:在50名日本成年患者进行鼻和/或鼻窦手术之前和之后,对鼻塞感以及鼻压和声学鼻测评估进行了评估。呼气和吸气时的鼻阻力与患者的知觉密切相关(P <0.05)。从声学流变仪测量获得的鼻腔容积(0-4 cm和0-7 cm)也与知觉很好相关(P <0.05)。在鼻测压和声学鼻测结果之间未发现显着关系。手术后知觉鼻塞,鼻压和声学鼻测结果(I形切口处的截面积除外)明显改善。鼻压法和声学鼻法是评估鼻塞的有价值的方法,但是我们必须考虑到这两种方法之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号