...
首页> 外文期刊>Gem & Jewellery News >Conflict diamonds and the Kimberley Process -- a Government perspective
【24h】

Conflict diamonds and the Kimberley Process -- a Government perspective

机译:冲突钻石与金伯利进程-政府的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Regular readers of this magazine will be familiar with the series of excellent articles written by Harry Levy on conflict diamonds and the Kimberley Process. I will try not to repeat anything Harry has already made clear in his articles, but I wanted to offer some personal thoughts on the Process and on its impact in the UK. First, on the Process itself. It is a unique structure that produced an unparalleled agreement. The idea of governments, industry and civil society negotiating an international agreement together as equal partners had not been tried before in a serious fashion. All three parties took some time getting used to the idea. Some of my fellow diplomats were at times rather indignant at being lambasted by straight-talking NGOs. And it was hardly a secret that the diamond industry and government officials were not natural bedfellows. But it did work and it produced the first global response to the increasing problem of the illicit exploitation of natural resources for illegal purposes. The Kimberley Process is being held up as an example that others might follow, both in form and in content.
机译:该杂志的普通读者将熟悉Harry Levy撰写的有关冲突钻石和金伯利进程的一系列优秀文章。我将不重复哈里在其文章中已经明确阐明的内容,但我想就该流程及其在英国的影响提供一些个人想法。首先,关于流程本身。这是一个独特的结构,产生了无与伦比的协议。从来没有认真尝试过政府,工业界和民间社会作为平等伙伴共同谈判一项国际协定的想法。三方都花了一些时间来适应这个想法。我的一些外交官有时对被直言不讳的非政府组织抨击感到非常愤慨。钻石行业和政府官员并非天生的同伴几乎不是秘密。但是它确实奏效了,并且它对日益增加的非法用于非法目的开采自然资源的问题作出了全球性的反应。金伯利进程在形式和内容上都是举世无双的榜样。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Gem & Jewellery News》 |2003年第3suppla期|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 矿物学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号